Additional Table 4.
The checklist of quality assessment for included studies in the present systematic review
| Study | Qualityassessment criteria | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.Were the descriptions of the patient group clear and adequate? (e.g., inclusion criteria strabismus or refraction) 1= yes, 0= no or too less information | 2. Were thedescriptions of the control group clear and adequate? (e.g., inclusion criteria, age, and gender)1= yes, 0=no or tooless information | 3. Were the patient group comparable to the control group in terms of age and gender? 1= yes, 0= no | 4. Whether patientswere combined with other subtypes ?= yes, 1= no | 5. Whatis the magnetic field strength? 1=3.0 Tesla, 0= 1.5Tesla | 6.Whether the descriptions of the imaging technique were clear sothat it couldbe reproduced? 1=yes, 0= no | 7. Whether statisticalresults were corrected for multiple comparison?1= corrected, 0= uncorrected | 8. Whether the conclusions were consistentwith the results obtained, andthe limitations were discussed? 1=yes, 0= no | Total score | |
| Lianget al., 2019 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Mendola et al., 2005 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Su et al., 2022 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Barnes et al., 2010 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Lu et al., 2020 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Lin et al., 2012 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Qi et al., 2016 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Li et al., 2013b | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Li et al., 2015 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Allen et al., 2018 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Duanet al., 2015 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Gupta et al., 2016 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Lee et al.,2001 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Wang et al., 2012 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Li et al., 2012 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Li et al., 2013a | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Muckli et al., 2006 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Hou et al.,2016 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Wang et al., 2017 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Thompson et al., 2019 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Ho and Giaschi, 2009 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Bonhomme et al., 2006 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Farivar et al., 2019 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Huanget al., 2017 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| Clavagnier et al., 2015 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Yanget al., 2019 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Shao et al., 2019 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Lianget al., 2016 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Tang et al., 2017 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Min et al., 2018 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Shi et al., 2022 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Peng et al., 2021 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Zhang et al., 2021 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Wu et al., 2020 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Liu et al., 2022 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Lianget al., 2017 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Wang et al., 2014 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Lu et al., 2019 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Ding et al., 2013 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |