Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 7;10:1205481. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1205481

Table 4.

Meta-regression model with the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of cardiovascular diseases mortality as a dependent variablea.

Variable Unadjusted meta-regression model Adjusted meta-regression model τ 2
Coefficient 95% CI P Coefficient 95% CI P
Without any covariate 0.213
Univariate model
Age 0.95 (0.90–1.00) 0.05 0.069
Year 1.10 (1.00–1.20) 0.04 0.131
Region
United States vs. other 1.31 (0.48–3.55) 0.54 0.265
Europe vs. other 0.76 (0.28–2.07) 0.54 0.265
Follow-up 0.97 (0.89–1.06) 0.48 0.208
Sample size 1.00 (0.99–1.00) 0.18 0.157
Diabetes status 0.60 (0.25–1.44) 0.21 0.166
Model 1 0.063
Year 1.06 (0.97–1.16) 0.12
Age 0.96 (0.91–1.00) 0.09
Model 2 0.072
Year 1.06 (0.95–1.17) 0.20
Age 0.96 (0.91–1.01) 0.12
Follow-up 0.98 (0.92–1.04) 0.59
Model 3 0.107
Year 1.09 (0.95–1.25) 0.14
Age 0.98 (0.89–1.08) 0.71
Follow-up 1.00 (0.92–1.08) 0.96
Sample size 1.00 (0.99–1.00) 0.44
Model 4 0.156
Year 1.11 (0.91–1.34) 0.17
Age 0.99 (0.87–1.12) 0.84
Follow-up 0.99 (0.87–1.13) 0.91
Sample size 1.00 (0.99–1.00) 0.41
Diabetes status 1.12 (0.19–7.75) 0.74
Model 5 0.013
Year 1.10 (0.88–1.37) 0.20
Age 0.96 (0.85–1.37) 0.37
Follow-up 0.96 (0.84–1.10) 0.42
Sample size 0.99 (0.99–1.00) 0.33
Diabetes status 1.19 (0.25–5.69) 0.67
United States vs. other 1.80 (0.61–5.34) 0.14
Model 6 0.013
Year 1.10 (0.88–1.37) 0.20
Age 0.96 (0.85–1.09) 0.50
Follow-up 0.96 (0.84–1.10) 0.42
Sample size 0.99 (0.99–1.00) 0.84
Diabetes status 1.19 (0.25–5.69) 0.67
Europe vs. other 0.55 (0.18–1.63) 0.14
a

The meta-regression model is based on the ReML estimator method. Initial heterogeneity without any variable assigned in the model was τ2 = 0.213. “Age” indicates the mean age; “Duration” indicates the duration of follow-up in years; “Sample size” indicates the total sample size; “Year” indicates the year of the study publication; “Coefficient” indicates the regression coefficient; and “τ2” indicates the between-study variance in a random-effects meta-analysis.