Table 5.
Impact of sex on the occurrence of E. aerophilus in fox lungs
| Country | Sample type | Male foxes | Female foxes | References | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| na | Prevalence (%) | 95% CI | na | Prevalence (%) | 95% CI | |||
| Norway | Lungs | 111 | 89.19 | 82.05–93.71 | 70 | 87.14 | 77.33–93.08 | Davidson et al. [21] |
| Romania | Lungs | 315 | 77.46* | 72.53–81.73 | 235 | 65.96* | 59.51–71.99 | Deak et al. [58] |
| Spain | Lungs | 46 | 32.61 | 19.5–48.0 | 41 | 26.83 | 14.2–42.9 | Garrido-Castañé et al. [59] |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | Lungs | 123 | 73.17 | 64.73–80.21 | 98 | 65.31 | 55.47–73.99 | Hodžić et al. [63] |
| Spain | Lungs | 149 | 34.23 | 27.09–42.16 | 108 | 32.41 | 24.32–41.71 | Martínez-Rondán et al. [73] |
| UK | Lungs | 143 | 60.84* | 52.66–68.46 | 128 | 40.63* | 32.52–49.29 | Morgan et al. [74] |
| Denmark | Lungs | 381 | 74.54 | 69.94–78.65 | 367 | 73.57 | 68.83–77.28 | Saeed et al. [20] |
CI Confidence interval
*Statistically significant differences in prevalence at P < 0.05
aSize of the study population