Skip to main content
. 2023 May 2;14(8):961–972. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14024

Table 3.

Receiver operating characteristic analysis for the prediction of MACEs by IR indices

Variables AUC (95% CI) Cut‐off value Specificity Sensitivity P for comparison
All participants
METS‐IR 0.596 (0.585–0.607) 28.529 0.546 0.627
HOMA‐IR 0.599 (0.588–0.611) 1.128 0.503 0.673 0.835
TyG 0.600 (0.589–0.612) 8.392 0.461 0.725 0.744
TyG‐BMI 0.571 (0.559–0.582) 170.474 0.592 0.574 0.000
TyG‐WHtR 0.561 (0.550–0.573) 4.236 0.490 0.667 0.014
TyG‐WC 0.547 (0.536–0.559) 670.524 0.487 0.648 0.001
Without diabetes
METS‐IR 0.588 (0.576–0.599) 28.492 0.462 0.730
HOMA‐IR 0.597 (0.586–0.609) 1.116 0.458 0.765 0.567
TyG 0.594 (0.582–0.605) 8.219 0.483 0.728 0.678
TyG‐BMI 0.564 (0.552–0.576) 168.304 0.657 0.514 0.000
TyG‐WHtR 0.553 (0.541–0.565) 4.089 0.486 0.662 0.030
TyG‐WC 0.538 (0.526–0.550) 690.675 0.619 0.521 0.004
Diabetes
METS‐IR 0.635 (0.595–0.674) 39.361 0.615 0.634
HOMA‐IR 0.598 (0.558–0.637) 2.345 0.692 0.537 0.021
TyG 0.593 (0.553–0.633) 9.163 0.582 0.629 0.019
TyG‐BMI 0.567 (0.526–0.607) 198.591 0.453 0.734 0.000
TyG‐WHtR 0.587 (0.546–0.626) 5.402 0.726 0.473 0.013
TyG‐WC 0.559 (0.519–0.599) 739.920 0.459 0.692 0.018

P for significance of comparison between METS‐IR and other IR indices. Values in bold indicate statistical significance (P value < 0.05). AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidential interval; MACEs, major adverse cardiovascular events; METS‐IR, metabolic score for insulin resistance.