Table 3.
Case 2 optimization results. (a) Q Minimum value, (b) Q Maximum value, (c) Q Target value (160.43 mm).
Test | x | T | Rex | δt | Q | Time(s) | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) | |||||||
PSO | 0.56209 | 88.23896 | 23,810.267 | 15.08936 | 140.00001 | 2.06804 | 0.000% |
GA | 0.68403 | 91.57782 | 29,136.058 | 17.26953 | 140.34339 | 1.60931 | 0.245% |
SA | 0.46223 | 87.68731 | 20,583.889 | 14.72154 | 140.00111 | 6.04936 | 0.001% |
ACOR | 0.74587 | 88.15312 | 33,278.632 | 15.03215 | 140.00000 | 6.39504 | 0.000% |
ABC | 0.42944 | 95.75970 | 18,866.932 | 15.17322 | 140.01345 | 2.03140 | 0.010% |
FA |
0.49915 |
95.33843 |
34,067.453 |
19.82131 |
140.00000 |
42.63396 |
0.000% |
(b) | |||||||
PSO | 0.58691 | 96.09353 | 25,573.342 | 14.97603 | 189.99996 | 2.03954 | 0.000% |
GA | 0.43280 | 99.53710 | 18,263.772 | 16.67329 | 189.93656 | 4.71640 | 0.033% |
SA | 0.47139 | 94.05170 | 20,699.414 | 13.97348 | 189.99680 | 5.93625 | 0.002% |
ACOR | 0.68237 | 97.19713 | 29,597.808 | 16.96797 | 189.51620 | 7.17532 | 0.255% |
ABC | 0.48797 | 103.32119 | 20,964.783 | 16.24127 | 189.98741 | 1.96457 | 0.007% |
FA |
0.57919 |
99.95795 |
23,111.229 |
16.87395 |
189.99954 |
42.97571 |
0.000% |
(c) | |||||||
PSO | 0.50773 | 95.82307 | 22,142.225 | 17.57906 | 160.43003 | 2.10864 | 0.000% |
GA | 0.47429 | 93.84061 | 20,418.737 | 16.39765 | 160.72842 | 1.45927 | 0.186% |
SA | 0.51949 | 92.58451 | 22,779.495 | 15.69151 | 160.47869 | 26.53560 | 0.030% |
ACOR | 0.38726 | 95.12689 | 16,906.831 | 17.17410 | 160.43000 | 6.13038 | 0.000% |
ABC | 0.64898 | 98.83050 | 28,231.721 | 15.99615 | 160.45468 | 2.00924 | 0.015% |
FA | 0.49059 | 99.94421 | 10,050.855 | 19.97608 | 160.43001 | 43.21707 | 0.000% |