Table 4.
Case 3 optimization results. (a) X Minimum value, (b) x Maximum value, (c) x Target value (0.61 m).
Test | x | T | Rex | δt | Q | Time(s) | Error |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) | |||||||
PSO | 0.08445 | 80.00000 | 3842.811 | 7.07210 | 190.00000 | 1.70131 | 0.000% |
GA | 0.09386 | 80.00000 | 4271.165 | 7.45590 | 180.22080 | 1.37934 | 11.148% |
SA | 0.08445 | 80.00000 | 3843.006 | 7.07230 | 189.99520 | 4.88419 | 0.006% |
ACOR | 0.08445 | 80.00000 | 3842.811 | 7.07210 | 190.00000 | 4.28200 | 0.000% |
ABC | 0.08445 | 80.00000 | 3842.820 | 7.07220 | 189.99980 | 1.73802 | 0.001% |
FA |
0.08445 |
80.00000 |
3842.817 |
7.07220 |
189.99990 |
29.13008 |
0.001% |
(b) | |||||||
PSO | 1.22659 | 122.52594 | 50,000.000 | 27.96016 | 189.98236 | 5.22242 | 0.001% |
GA | 1.22660 | 122.53093 | 50,000.000 | 27.96040 | 189.99718 | 80.20104 | 0.000% |
SA | 1.22660 | 122.53181 | 50,000.000 | 27.96050 | 189.99955 | 21.08328 | 0.000% |
ACOR | 1.24910 | 118.75625 | 49,256.225 | 27.53398 | 180.14272 | 104.38318 | 1.834% |
ABC | 1.22660 | 122.53109 | 50,000.000 | 27.96045 | 189.99760 | 5.90879 | 0.000% |
FA |
1.22656 |
122.50602 |
50,000.000 |
27.95894 |
189.92382 |
7.89300 |
0.003% |
(c) | |||||||
PSO | 0.61000 | 96.66315 | 24,145.583 | 19.28457 | 150.30341 | 5.11667 | 0.000% |
GA | 0.61332 | 97.51306 | 26,633.790 | 19.35116 | 153.87966 | 4.53231 | 0.545% |
SA | 0.61000 | 103.47060 | 26,084.444 | 19.39819 | 182.14272 | 20.49119 | 0.000% |
ACOR | 0.61000 | 101.59221 | 26,210.239 | 19.36688 | 173.40599 | 86.34984 | 0.000% |
ABC | 0.61000 | 99.24683 | 26,369.785 | 19.32768 | 162.43662 | 5.43169 | 0.000% |
FA | 0.61001 | 100.24184 | 26,302.294 | 19.34431 | 167.08834 | 1.70427 | 0.001% |