TABLE 2.
Features for functional performance and subjective evaluation of readiness level for each cluster.
| Functional performance | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kinematic compatibility | Kinetic (dynamic) adjustability | Balance capabilities | Adaptation to non-standardized settings | Safety | Weight and other | |
| ADR | +/− | − − | − | − − | + | + |
| Spring-CAM | +/− | +/− | +/− | − | + | + |
| Clutch | +/− | + | − | +/− | + | ++ |
| Elect. Clutch | + | + | − | +/− | +/− | +/− |
| Rigid transm | + | + | +/− | +/− | − | − |
| SEA | + | ++ | + | + | +/− | − |
| Cable driven | + | + | − | ++ | +/− | +/− |
| PAM | + | +/− | +/− | +/− | − | + |
Grades are presented following a 5-points scale with (++) as very good, (+) as good, (+/−) as acceptable, (−) as poor and (−) as very poor.