TABLE 3.
Scores from a written usability survey completed by five observers that participated in night‐time surveys using four devices to detect artificially heated Plains‐wanderer models in native Victorian grassland.
| Survey category | Spotlight | Low‐resolution thermal scope | High‐resolution thermal scope | Medium‐resolution thermal scanner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ease of conducting surveys | 50 | 33 | 44 | 40 |
| Ease of detection | 42 | 24 | 47 | 45 |
| Physical comfort | 39 | 31 | 41 | 42 |
| Suitability for detecting small endotherms | 15 | 6 | 25 | 23 |
| Total | 146 | 94 | 157 | 150 |
Note: Responses were provided as a score out of 5 (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree). The three categories dealing with ease of use and ergonomics each consisted of two questions (maximum available score of 50), the last category assessing suitability for target endotherms consisted of a single question (maximum available score of 25). The total available score for each device was 175.