Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 21;13(7):e10331. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10331

TABLE 3.

Scores from a written usability survey completed by five observers that participated in night‐time surveys using four devices to detect artificially heated Plains‐wanderer models in native Victorian grassland.

Survey category Spotlight Low‐resolution thermal scope High‐resolution thermal scope Medium‐resolution thermal scanner
Ease of conducting surveys 50 33 44 40
Ease of detection 42 24 47 45
Physical comfort 39 31 41 42
Suitability for detecting small endotherms 15 6 25 23
Total 146 94 157 150

Note: Responses were provided as a score out of 5 (1 = strongly disagree, 2 = disagree, 3 = neutral, 4 = agree, 5 = strongly agree). The three categories dealing with ease of use and ergonomics each consisted of two questions (maximum available score of 50), the last category assessing suitability for target endotherms consisted of a single question (maximum available score of 25). The total available score for each device was 175.