TABLE A2.
Scores from a written usability survey completed by five observers that participated in night‐time surveys using four devices to detect artificially heated Plains‐wanderer (P. torquatus) models in native Victorian grassland.
| Survey questions | Spotlight | Low‐resolution thermal scope | High‐resolution thermal scope | Handheld thermal scanner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I was able to easily follow the transect for the whole survey, and I did not lose track of the transect line | 25 | 10 | 20 | 22 |
| When I detected a model Plains‐wanderer within 5 m of the transect line, I could see it clearly with the device | 23 | 14 | 25 | 25 |
| When I detected a Plains‐wanderer model with the device and walked out to check, it was always a Plains‐wanderer model rather than another, mis‐identified object | 19 | 10 | 22 | 20 |
| I found the device comfortable to hold when in use | 23 | 17 | 20 | 22 |
| I did not have to take breaks during surveys due to the device | 16 | 14 | 21 | 20 |
| I was able to quickly and easily learn how to use the device | 25 | 23 | 24 | 18 |
| I would recommend this device for ecological surveys targeting small endotherms | 15 | 6 | 25 | 23 |
| Total | 146 | 94 | 157 | 150 |
Note: Answers were given as a score out of 5 (1 = strongly disagree, 3 = neutral, 5 = strongly agree), such that each score is out of 25, and the total score for each device is out of 175.