Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 21;13(7):e10331. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10331

TABLE A2.

Scores from a written usability survey completed by five observers that participated in night‐time surveys using four devices to detect artificially heated Plains‐wanderer (P. torquatus) models in native Victorian grassland.

Survey questions Spotlight Low‐resolution thermal scope High‐resolution thermal scope Handheld thermal scanner
I was able to easily follow the transect for the whole survey, and I did not lose track of the transect line 25 10 20 22
When I detected a model Plains‐wanderer within 5 m of the transect line, I could see it clearly with the device 23 14 25 25
When I detected a Plains‐wanderer model with the device and walked out to check, it was always a Plains‐wanderer model rather than another, mis‐identified object 19 10 22 20
I found the device comfortable to hold when in use 23 17 20 22
I did not have to take breaks during surveys due to the device 16 14 21 20
I was able to quickly and easily learn how to use the device 25 23 24 18
I would recommend this device for ecological surveys targeting small endotherms 15 6 25 23
Total 146 94 157 150

Note: Answers were given as a score out of 5 (1 = strongly disagree, 3 = neutral, 5 = strongly agree), such that each score is out of 25, and the total score for each device is out of 175.