. 2023 Jul 21;13(7):e10329. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10329

TABLE A1.

Body lengths (in mm) of Harpalus affinis and H. rufipes from agricultural and urban habitats, rural and city areas across space and time per sex.

Species	Comparison	Sex	Medians [mm]		Test	w‐Value	Chi‐square	p‐Value
H. affinis	SBL ~ Sex	–	Female	9.01	Wilcox.	63,318	–	<.0001
	SBL ~ Sex	–	Male	8.70	Wilcox.	63,318	–	<.0001
	SBL ~ Habitat	Female	Agricultural	9.22	Wilcox.	78.5	–	.728
		Female	Urban	8.88		78.5	–	.728
		Male	Agricultural	8.51		170.5	–	.229
		Male	Urban	8.70		170.5	–	.229
	SBL ~ Area	Female	Rural	9.07	Wilcox.	7468.5	–	.780
		Female	City	9.01		7468.5	–	.780
		Male	Rural	8.76		19,296	–	.313
		Male	City	8.63		19,296	–	.313
	SBL ~ Rural over time	Female	1892–1949	8.88	Krusk.–Wal.	–	0.3305	.848
			1957–1998	9.07
			2016–2017	9.22
		Male	1892–1949	8.76		–	1.0705	.586
			1957–1998	8.76
			2016–2017	8.51
	SBL ~ City over time	Female	1892–1949	9.09	Krusk.–Wal.	–	2.0146	.365
			1957–1998	9.01
			2016–2017	8.88
		Male	1892–1949	8.62		–	1.1425	.565
			1957–1998	8.63
			2016–2017	8.70
H. rufipes	SBL ~ Sex	–	Female	13.46	Wilcox.	6557	–	<.0001
	SBL ~ Sex	–	Male	12.53	Wilcox.	6557	–	<.0001
	SBL ~ Habitat	Female	Agricultural	13.52	Wilcox.	272	–	.142
		Female	Urban	13.17		272	–	.142
		Male	Agricultural	12.64		298	–	.081
		Male	Urban	12.15		298	–	.081
	SBL ~ Area	Female	Rural	13.52	Wilcox.	775	–	.196
		Female	City	13.17		775	–	.196
		Male	Rural	12.52		1046.5	–	.587
		Male	City	12.57		1046.5	–	.587
	SBL ~ Rural over time	Female	1892–1949	13.22	Krusk.–Wal.	–	1.9911	.370
			1957–1998	13.64
			2016–2017	13.52
		Male	1892–1949	12.38		–	2.3087	.315
			1957–1998	12.29
			2016–2017	12.64
	SBL ~ City over time	Female	1892–1949	12.96	Krusk.–Wal.	–	0.76896	.681
			1957–1998	13.64
			2016–2017	12.87
		Male	1892–1949	12.93		–	10.516	.005
			1957–1998	13.09
			2016–2017	11.76

Note: Results of Wilcoxon rank sum tests (Wilcox.) for comparisons of body lengths between females and males, for comparisons of body lengths between habitats in females and males, and for comparisons of body lengths between areas in females and males. Results of Kruskal–Wallis rank sum tests (Krusk.–Wal.) for comparisons of body lengths between time periods in rural areas in females and males, and between time periods in city areas in females and males, significant differences are given in bold.