Table 3.

Relationship between TyG-WC and NAFLD risk in different models.

	Model 1 Odds ratios (95%CI)	P value	Model 2 Odds ratios (95%CI)	P value	Model 3 Odds ratios (95%CI)	P value	Model 4 Odds ratios (95%CI)	P value
Female
TyG-WC	1.019 (1.018, 1.021)	<0.001	1.019 (1.017, 1.020)	<0.001	1.016 (1.014, 1.018)	<0.001	1.008 (1.005, 1.011)	<0.001
TyG-WC (trisection)
T1	1.0		1.0		1.0		1.0
T2	19.189 (11.753, 31.329)	<0.001	16.388 (9.984, 26.898)	<0.001	10.966 (6.580, 18.274)	<0.001	5.475 (3.243, 9.244)	<0.001
T3	127.822 (78.746, 207.482)	<0.001	94.839 (57.561, 156.260)	<0.001	36.777 (21.339, 63.385)	<0.001	7.162 (3.865, 13.273)	<0.001
P for trend	<0.001		<0.001		<0.001
Male
TyG-WC	1.016 (1.015, 1.017)	<0.001	1.016 (1.015, 1.017)	<0.001	1.013 (1.012, 1.014)	<0.001	1.007 (1.005, 1.009)	<0.001
TyG-WC (trisection)
T1	1.0		1.0		1.0		1.0
T2	8.147 (4.650, 14.274)	<0.001	7.456 (4.250, 13.080)	<0.001	4.467 (2.479, 8.048)	<0.001	2.598 (1.442, 4.679)	0.001
T3	63.144 (36.403, 109.528)	<0.001	52.458 (30.153, 91.262)	<0.001	14.577 (8.070, 26.332)	<0.001	4.292 (2.339, 7.876)	<0.001
P for trend	<0.001		<0.001		<0.001		<0.001
Total
TyG-WC	1.017 (1.016, 1.018)	<0.001	1.017 (1.016, 1.017)	<0.001	1.014 (1.013, 1.015)	<0.001	1.007 (1.006, 1.009)	<0.001
TyG-WC (trisection)
T1	1.0		1.0		1.0		1.0
T2	13.914 (9.614, 20.137)	<0.001	12.147 (8.378, 17.611)	<0.001	7.842 (5.335, 11.527)	<0.001	4.202 (2.845, 6.204)	<0.001
T3	102.810 (71.388, 148.060)	<0.001	80.084 (55.378, 115.812)	<0.001	25.576 (17.236, 37.953)	<0.001	6.534 (4.303, 9.921)	<0.001
P for trend	<0.001		<0.001		<0.001

Model 1, without covariate adjustment; Model 2, adjusted for age, smoking status, habit of exercise, SBP; Model 3, adjusted for Model 2+HbA1C, FPG, TG, TC, HDL, GGT, ALT, AST, and Model 4, adjusted for Model 3+BMI.