Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 7;11:1225937. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1225937

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

(A) Colony of 4T1 cells treated with different formulations and the irradiation dose was 4 Gy (B) CLSM images of DCFH-DA-stained 4T1 cells after treatment with different formulations. Scale bars: 20 μm (C) Detection of 4T1 cells’ DNA damage through immunofluorescence staining of γ-H2AX, induced by different formulations. Scale bars: 20 μm (D) Dark cytotoxicity of CH on 4T1 cells (E) In vitro cytotoxicity of different formulations against 4T1 cells (F) Corresponding quantitative analysis of ROS generation in 3A. ***p < 0.005; Student’s t-test.