Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 11;14:1089664. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1089664

Table 2.

Outcomes and complications in MIC patients compared to transplanted controls out to year 5.

Controls
(N = 15)
MIC P A
Group A, B
(N = 6)
Group C
(N = 4)
Total cohort
(N = 10)
Pat. with BCR – N (%)
Rejection episodes – N
Acute TCMR (≥BANFF IA)
Chronic active TCMR
Acute ABMR
Chronic active ABMR
1 (7)
1
0
0
0
1
1 (17)
1
0
1
0
0
0 (0)
0
0
0
0
0
1 (10)
1
0
1
0
0
1.0
Pat. with de novo DSA – N (%) 5 (33) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0.061
Pat. with DGF – N (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1.0
Pat. with opportunistic infections – N (%)
Infectious episodes – N
Pneumonia
CMV reactivation > 1,000 IU/mL
BKV replication > 10,000 copies/mL
BKV-associated nephropathy
Other
8 (53)
13
4
4
2
0
3
1 (17)B
1B
0
1B
0
0
0
0 (0)
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 (10)B
1B
0
1B
0
0
0
0.041
Pat. with non-opportunistic infections – N (%)
Infectious episodes – N
CVC-associated infection
Urinary tract infection
Post-operative wound infection
Pneumonia
Influenza A/B, COVID-19
Other or unknown
13 (87)
43
1
16
1
7
3
15
4 (67)
9
1
6
0
0
1
1
3 (75)
15
0
8
1
1
1
4
7 (70)
24
1
14
1
1
2
5
0.36
Pat. with multi-resistant bacteria – N (%) 3 (20) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0.25
Pat. with rehospitalization – N (%)
Total rehospitalizations – N
12 (80)
38
6 (100)
10
4 (100)
16
10 (100)
26
0.25
Pat. with PTLD or malignancy – N (%) 1 (7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1.0
Pat. with cardiovascular events – N (%) 1 (7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1.0
Pat. with surgical complicationsC – N (%)
Bleeding
Wound healing disturbances
Urinary leakage or stenosis
Lymphocele
Hernia
Other
6 (40)
0
0
2
2
1
1
2 (33)
0
2
0
0
0
0
2 (50)
1
0
1
0
0
0
4 (40)
1
2
1
0
0
0
1.0
Total antihypertensive therapeutic intensity score (TIS) – median (range)
Year 1
Year 3
Year 5
0.9 (0-2.8)
1.0 (0-2.3)
0.9 (0-2.5)
1.1 (0.3-1.5)
1.1 (0.3-1.8)
1.3 (0.3-1.8)
1.0 (0.2-3.0)
1.0 (0.4-2.5)
1.5 (0.4-2.8)
1.0 (0.2-3.0)
1.0 (0.3-2.5)
1.3 (0.3-2.8)
0.94
0.87
0.65
NODATC – N (%) 2 (13) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0.50

AFor the comparison of MIC patients, Total cohort (N = 10) versus Controls (N = 15). BThis episode was identified retrospectively during review of a letter from the primary physician. CMV reactivation had resolved without treatment. CRequiring treatment. ABMR, antibody-mediated rejection; BCR, biopsy-confirmed rejection; BKV, BK virus; CMV, cytomegalovirus; CVC, central venous catheter; DGF, delayed graft function; DSA, donor-specific HLA-A, -B, -DR, -DQ antibodies at a cutoff of 1,000 MFI; NODAT, new-onset diabetes after transplantation; PTLD, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease; TCMR, T-cell-mediated rejection.