Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: Biophysica. 2021 May 24;1(2):204–221. doi: 10.3390/biophysica1020016

Figure 2. Simulations of subunit rotation in a eukaryotic ribosome.

Figure 2.

Using an all-atom structure-based model [24], we simulated spontaneous rotation and backrotation of the SSU in yeast. A) Euler angle decomposition was used to describe the orientation of the SSU, where the angle ϕbody measures rotation of the SSU body, relative to the LSU. ϕbody is defined as rotation about the yellow vector. B) The tile angle θbody describes rotation that is orthogonal to the body rotation angle ϕbody. The tilt axis (red) may be in any direction perpendicular to the rotation axis (yellow), where the direction of tilting axis is given by ψbody. In the figure, ψbody~60 is shown. C) ϕbody and θbody shown for a single simulation (of 3, in total). In this model, there are distinct and sharp transitions between the unrotated ϕbody~-1 and rotated ϕbody~7 orientations. There are also concommittent changes in θbody.. For reference, the cryo-EM structures [14] correspond to ϕbody~-1.8 and θbody~2.4 for the unrotated state and ~8.6 and θbody~5.0 for the rotated state. Negative and non-zero angles for the unrotated conformation reflect the relative orientation of the SSU in yeast, relative to the reference bacterial system (E. coli). D) In the simulation, the direction of tilting ψbody shifts to slightly higher values as the SSU rotates and tilts. This reveals how the direction of structural fluctuations depends on the global conformation of the ribosome. The effective simulated times are estimated based on previous comparisons with explicit-solvent simulations [31]