Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: J Excell Coll Teach. 2022 Winter;33(4):105–132.

Table 5.

Participant Agreement With Program Usefulness and Effectiveness

Please rate your agreement with the following statements. Mean Rating
The videos were effective at highlighting important mentoring practices.** 4.32 (SEM = 0.09)

The videos were engaging to watch.** 3.97 (SEM = 0.10)

The videos were a useful component of this program.** 4.34 (SEM = 0.09)

The facilitated discussion sessions allowed me to expand upon topics I found to be important or interesting.** 4.50 (SEM = 0.07)

The facilitated discussions were engaging.** 4.53 (SEM = 0.07)

The facilitated discussions allowed me to hear different perspectives from others.*** 4.71 (SEM = 0.05)

The facilitated discussions were a useful component of this program.*** 4.66 (SEM = 0.07)

The supplemental materials contain resources that I will use now or in the future.** 4.13 (SEM = 0.10)

I would participate in this program with or without a stipend*. 3.66 (SEM = 0.15)

Note. Mean ratings of agreement based on a Likert scale of 1 (“Strongly Disagree”) to 5 (“Strongly Agree”). The mean ratings to all statements were all significantly above a test-value of 3.0 (indicative of “Somewhat Agree”), with p < 0.001 values, are designated with *. Statements with mean ratings significantly above a test value of 3.5 (indicative of “Agree”), with p < 0.05 values, are designated with ** and those significantly above a test value of 4.5 (indicative of “Strongly Agree”), with p < 0.05 values, are designated with ***.