Table 5.
Participant Agreement With Program Usefulness and Effectiveness
Please rate your agreement with the following statements. | Mean Rating |
---|---|
The videos were effective at highlighting important mentoring practices.** | 4.32 (SEM = 0.09) |
| |
The videos were engaging to watch.** | 3.97 (SEM = 0.10) |
| |
The videos were a useful component of this program.** | 4.34 (SEM = 0.09) |
| |
The facilitated discussion sessions allowed me to expand upon topics I found to be important or interesting.** | 4.50 (SEM = 0.07) |
| |
The facilitated discussions were engaging.** | 4.53 (SEM = 0.07) |
| |
The facilitated discussions allowed me to hear different perspectives from others.*** | 4.71 (SEM = 0.05) |
| |
The facilitated discussions were a useful component of this program.*** | 4.66 (SEM = 0.07) |
| |
The supplemental materials contain resources that I will use now or in the future.** | 4.13 (SEM = 0.10) |
| |
I would participate in this program with or without a stipend*. | 3.66 (SEM = 0.15) |
Note. Mean ratings of agreement based on a Likert scale of 1 (“Strongly Disagree”) to 5 (“Strongly Agree”). The mean ratings to all statements were all significantly above a test-value of 3.0 (indicative of “Somewhat Agree”), with p < 0.001 values, are designated with *. Statements with mean ratings significantly above a test value of 3.5 (indicative of “Agree”), with p < 0.05 values, are designated with ** and those significantly above a test value of 4.5 (indicative of “Strongly Agree”), with p < 0.05 values, are designated with ***.