Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 6;44(3):261–273. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769621

Table 1. Provider versus client engagement across hearing aid fitting service models.

Engagement level Technology accessibility Stage of hearing aid care Device selection/purchase/delivery channel Service models Level of personalization
Provider-led (currently the predominant mode of hearing aid care) Provider controlled/delivered in clinic or remotely via HCP-accessible fitting software Initial fitting and follow-up Clinic-based devices Clinic-based/remote/blended Low (based on in-person client feedback)
No access for client NA
Semi-client led (increasingly available though still a minority among major hearing aid brands) Provider controlled/delivered in clinic or remotely via HCP-accessible fitting software Initial fitting and follow-up Clinic-based/DTC-provided devices Clinic-based/remote/blended Moderate (minimal or tokenistic client-controlled remote programming that may include a client–HCP feedback loop)
Client-controlled remote adjustment applications Follow-up Clinic-based/DTC-provided devices Remote/blended
Client-led (most commonly found in self-fitting hearing aids and hearables via DTC channels but are compatible with clinic based and supported provision) Provider accessible (variable control) clinic based/remote
HCP-accessible fitting software
Initial fitting/follow-up Clinic-based/DTC-provided devices Clinic-based/remote/blended High (HCP programming and adjustment expertise and skills requested based on client needs and preferences along the care journey)
Client-controlled remote fitting/adjustment applications (self-fitting hearing aids and hearables) Initial fitting/follow-up Client-controlled Remote/blended

Abbreviations: DTC, direct-to-consumer; HCP, hearing care provider.