Table 1. Provider versus client engagement across hearing aid fitting service models.
| Engagement level | Technology accessibility | Stage of hearing aid care | Device selection/purchase/delivery channel | Service models | Level of personalization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Provider-led (currently the predominant mode of hearing aid care) | Provider controlled/delivered in clinic or remotely via HCP-accessible fitting software | Initial fitting and follow-up | Clinic-based devices | Clinic-based/remote/blended | Low (based on in-person client feedback) |
| No access for client | NA | ||||
| Semi-client led (increasingly available though still a minority among major hearing aid brands) | Provider controlled/delivered in clinic or remotely via HCP-accessible fitting software | Initial fitting and follow-up | Clinic-based/DTC-provided devices | Clinic-based/remote/blended | Moderate (minimal or tokenistic client-controlled remote programming that may include a client–HCP feedback loop) |
| Client-controlled remote adjustment applications | Follow-up | Clinic-based/DTC-provided devices | Remote/blended | ||
| Client-led (most commonly found in self-fitting hearing aids and hearables via DTC channels but are compatible with clinic based and supported provision) | Provider accessible (variable control) clinic based/remote HCP-accessible fitting software |
Initial fitting/follow-up | Clinic-based/DTC-provided devices | Clinic-based/remote/blended | High (HCP programming and adjustment expertise and skills requested based on client needs and preferences along the care journey) |
| Client-controlled remote fitting/adjustment applications (self-fitting hearing aids and hearables) | Initial fitting/follow-up | Client-controlled | Remote/blended |
Abbreviations: DTC, direct-to-consumer; HCP, hearing care provider.