Table 10.

Association of the contents of attenuated and brief intermittent psychotic symptoms with other disorders, logistic regression analysis (N = 232).

SIPS No.	Content	Beta	SEa	Wald (df = 1)	pa	Exp (Beta)	95% CI; lower	95% CI; upper
P1B	Experience of being controlled by external forces	2.803	8.383	7.203	0.002	16.494	2.130	127.737
P1C	Unusual religious ideas	−17.634	1.270	1.9 E-7	0.003	0.000	0.000	n.c.b
P2	Paranoid ideas of reference involving friends/family	1.762	6.816	3.331	0.025c	5.826	0.878	38.662
P4D	Painful bodily sensation	2.470	6.961	7.249	0.003	11.824	1.958	71.400

Reference group: no other disorder, GoF: ${\chi }_{(4)}^2$ = 13.537; p = 0.009; Nagelkerke's R² = 0.179. ^aValues from Bootstrapping (N = 627). ^bn.c., not calculable due to zero cases with the present item in the reference group. ^cBecause bootstrapping does not require distributional assumptions, the bootstrap provides more accurate inferences when the data are not well-behaved, e.g., including little events, or when the sample size is small (51). Thus, we followed the bootstrapping results, and considered variables significant predictors if the bootstrapping became significant, even if these were non-significant in the initial regression analysis and, therefore, included the 1 within the 95%-CI. P1 “unusual thought content/delusional ideas” with B: section “first rank symptoms”, C: section “overvalued beliefs”, D: section “other unusual thoughts/delusional ideas”, and E: section “non-persecutory ideas of reference.” P2 “suspiciousness/persecutory ideas.” P3 “grandiose ideas.” P4 “perceptual abnormalities/hallucinations”; with B: section “auditory distortions, illusions, hallucinations”, C: section “visual distortions, illusions, hallucinations”, D: section “somatic distortions, illusions, hallucinations”, and E: section “olfactory and gustatory distortions, illusions, hallucinations.” P5 “disorganized communication”.