Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 7;17:1185768. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1185768

Table 2.

Effect of intervention and time on cognitive outcomes.

Control group (n = 15) Cogmed group (n = 17) P Effect size measurement
Baseline Post-training Baseline Post-training Groups Times Groups*times Cohen’s d effect size Magnitude
Intention-to-treat analysis
Primary outcome
Working memory 0.31 ± 1.1 0.11 ± 1.1 −0.29 ± 0.82 −0.10 ± 0.97 0.07 0.72 0.12 0.21 Small
Secondary outcomes
Executive function 0.25 ± 0.93 0.21 ± 1.1 −0.22 ± 1.0 −0.18 ± 0.92 0.15 0.71 0.70 0.39 Small
Verbal memory −0.15 ± 1.3 −0.40 ± 1.0 0.13 ± 0.65 0.37 ± 0.84 0.13 0.92 0.21 −0.82 Large
Visuospatial ability 0.18 ± 0.75 −0.17 ± 1.0 −0.16 ± 1.2 0.15 ± 0.97 0.92 0.60 0.04 −0.32 Small
Global cognition 0.26 ± 0.94 0.09 ± 0.89 −0.23 ± 1.0 −0.08 ± 1.11 0.15 0.57 0.50 0.17 Insignificant
Per-protocol analysis Control group (n = 11) Cogmed group (n = 13)
Primary outcome
Working memory 0.26 ± 1.2 −0.10 ± 1.1 −0.42 ± 0.88 −0.22 ± 1.1 0.12 0.53 0.08 0.12 Insignificant
Secondary outcomes
Executive function 0.27 ± 1.1 0.27 ± 1.2 −0.17 ± 1.2 −0.03 ± 0.98 0.20 0.86 0.61 0.29 Small
Verbal memory −0.21 ± 1.4 −0.28 ± 1.0 0.12 ± 0.74 0.35 ± 0.92 0.30 0.67 0.56 −0.64 Moderate
Visuospatial ability −0.01 ± 0.72 −0.24 ± 0.62 −0.03 ± 1.2 0.31 ± 1.02 0.23 0.94 0.12 −0.63 Moderate
Global cognition 0.30 ± 0.95 −0.17 ± 0.79 −0.04 ± 0.99 0.06 ± 1.2 0.49 0.18 0.19 −0.22 Small

p values from linear mixed model analysis for repeated measurements adjusted for age, sex, and education.

Cohen’s d effect size for differences between the groups in post-training measurement.

Mean ± SD of the composite Z-scores.