Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 7;14:1223420. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1223420

Table 1.

Effects of different fertilization treatments on peach fruit yield and quality.

Treatment Yield (kg/667m2) SAR
CK 3178.07 ± 528.896c 34.38 ± 2.711b
SDH.2 3327.07 ± 27.916c 37.03 ± 3.950ab
SDH.3 3592.28 ± 220.051bc 38.52 ± 0.402ab
SDH.4 3860.00 ± 130.400ab 40.07 ± 5.306ab
SKR.2 3372.50 ± 72.317c 37.30 ± 1.140ab
SKR.3 3499.52 ± 104.960bc 38.42 ± 3.673ab
SKR.4 3925.15 ± 204.192ab 41.49 ± 6.012a
SYT.2 3302.21 ± 495.168c 37.44 ± 2.812ab
SYT.3 3577.39 ± 94.471bc 38.39 ± 1.927ab
SYT.4 4062.14 ± 199.232a 41.58 ± 6.562a

SAR, sugar/acid ratio; CK, no fertilization, 0 kg/667 m2; SDH.2, Dahua PBOF, 2560 kg/667 m2; SDH.3, Dahua PBOF, 3840 kg/667 m2; SDH.4, Dahua PBOF, 5120 kg/667 m2; SKR.2, Kerui PBOF, 2560 kg/667 m2; SKR.3, Kerui PBOF, 3840 kg/667 m2; SKR.4, Kerui PBOF, 5120 kg/667 m2; SYT.2, Yite commercial organic fertilizer, 2,560 kg/667 m2; SYT.3, Yite commercial organic fertilizer, 3,840 kg/667 m2; SYT.4, Yite commercial organic fertilizer, 5,120 kg/667 m2.The different letters in the table indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05.