Skip to main content
. 2023 May 3;43(5):369–377. doi: 10.1007/s40261-023-01270-x

Table 2.

Efficacy of olipudase alfa in patients with acid sphingomyelinase deficiency types B or A/B

Treatment (no. of pts) LSM percent change from baseline to week 52 [baseline values]
% predicted DLCOa Spleen volumea Liver volume Platelet count
In randomized, double-blind, phase 2/3 ASCEND trial in adult pts [24]
 Olipudase alfa (18) + 21.97 [49.4 %] − 39.45 [11.7 MN] − 28.06 [1.4 MN] + 16.82 [107.2 × 109/L]
 Placebo (18) + 2.96 [48.5%] + 0.48 [11.2 MN] − 1.47 [1.6 MN] + 2.49 [115.6 × 109/L]
 Difference + 19.0** − 39.9*** − 26.6*** + 14.3*
In single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2 ASCEND-Peds trial in paediatric pts [25]
 Overall (20) + 33†† [54.8%] − 49.2††† [19 MN] − 40.6††† [2.7 MN] + 34.03††† [137.4 × 109/L]
 Adolescent (4) + 28b − 46.9††† − 41††b + 45.01 [98.93 × 109/L]
 Child (9) + 35††b − 46.0††† − 37†††b + 30.67 [148.82 × 109/L]
 Infant/early child (7) NA − 54.6††† − 45†††b + 31.76 [145.66 × 109/L]

DLCO lung diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, LSM least squares mean, MN multiples of normal, NA not applicable, pts patients, SRS splenomegaly-related score

*p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001 vs placebo; p ≤ 0.05, ††p ≤ 0.01, †††p ≤ 0.001 vs baseline

aPrimary endpoints. In the USA, the spleen endpoint was spleen volume combined with SRS (see main text for SRS description); there was no significant difference between olipudase alfa and placebo group for SRS at week 52

bData extracted from graph