Table 2.
Quality of Diagnostic “Assessment of the Assessment” Elements in the Chart: Results of Review of 100 Charts
| Domain and individual items | Mean (SD) |
|---|---|
| Diagnostic assessment | 2.0 (0.92) |
| a. Chief complaint | 2.4 (1.87) |
| b. Differential diagnosis | 2.1 (1.66) |
| c. Psychosocial information | 0.6 (1.39) |
| d. Possible etiologies | 3.1 (1.46) |
| e. Degree of certainty | 1.9 (1.64) |
| Follow-up plan | 1.7 (0.83) |
| a. Mentions diagnostic tests | 2.5 (2.06) |
| b. Contingencies | 2.3 (1.83) |
| c. Time frames | 0.9 (1.77) |
| d. Rationale | 1.0 (1.73) |
| Situational awareness/safety nets | 1.7 (1.09) |
| a. Red Flags: | 2.0 (1.36) |
| b. Don’t miss diagnoses | 2.7 (1.75) |
| c. Pitfalls | 0.5 (1.44) |
| Other diagnostic assessment elements | 4.7 (1.20) |
| a. Quality of diagnosis/differential diagnosis | 3.6 (1.32) |
| b. Adequate tests | 4.7 (1.26) |
| c. Avoids over-testing | 5.5 (0.92) |
| d. Succinctness | 4.9 (1.07) |
| e. Clinician readability | 5.7 (0.66) |
| f. Patient readability | 2.9 (0.86) |
| g. Avoids legal liability pejorative red flags | 6.0 (0.00) |