Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 21;14:4418. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39996-z

Table 1.

BMI distribution of the investigated subgroups in five patient cohorts

Total number of patients Median (range) Lean (%) Overweight (%) Obese (%)
METABRIC NST ER+/HER2− 215

26.17

(18.55, 46.41)

86 (40.0) 73 (34.0) 56 (26.0)
NST ER−/HER2− 68

25.78

(20.47, 43.46)

30 (44.1) 24 (35.3) 14 (20.6)
ICGC NST ER+/HER2− 177

26.00

(18.70, 51.80)

67 (37.9) 64 (36.2) 46 (26.0)
NST ER−/HER2− 84

26.00

(18.60, 55.40)

36 (42.9) 30 (35.7) 18 (21.4)
ELBC ILC ER+/HER2− 545

23.34

(18.51, 40.86)

351 (64.4) 143 (25.2) 51 (9.4)
MINDACT NST ER+/HER2− 735

25.24

(18.59, 68.68)

354 (48.2) 250 (34.0) 131 (17.8)
NST ER−/HER2− 118

25.28

(19.00, 39.88)

53 (44.9) 54 (45.8) 11 (9.3)
ILC ER+/HER2− 104

24.19

(19.27, 37.05)

65 (62.5) 32 (30.8) 7 (6.7)
Biokey NST ER+/HER2− 13

24.79

(19.72, 44.08)

6 (46.2) 3 (23.1) 4 (30.8)
NST ER−/HER2− 12

24.13

(22.6, 32.05)

8 (66.7) 2 (16.7) 2 (16.7)

Subgroups were determined by histological subtype, and the ER and HER2 status. Only cases with available molecular profiling data, either genomic profiling, bulk, or single-cell transcriptomic profiling, were included.