Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 7;9(7):e17891. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17891

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

IHC analysis of PPARα, ACADM, ACCA1, ACSL1, ACSL4 and ACSL5. (A) PPARα expression in the liver detected by IHC and the area density of PPARα positive signals in the full field of view was semi-quantitatively analyzed (→). (B) ACADM expression in the liver detected by IHC and the area density of ACADM positive signals in the full field of view was semi-quantitatively analyzed (→). (C) ACCA1 expression in the liver evaluated by IHC and the area density of ACCA1 positive signals in the full field of view was semi-quantitatively analyzed (→). (D) ACSL1 expression in the liver elucidated by IHC and the area density of ACSL1 positive signals in the full field of view was semi-quantitatively analyzed (→). (E) ACSL4 expression in the liver elucidated by IHC and the area density of ACSL4 positive signals in the full field of view was semi-quantitatively analyzed (→). (F) ACSL5 expression in the liver elucidated by IHC and the area density of ACSL5 positive signals in the full field of view was semi-quantitatively analyzed (→). *, the TG groups compared with the control group, p < 0.05; **, the TG groups compared with the control group, p < 0.01; #, the TG + GA group compared with the TG group at the same dose, p < 0.05; ##, the TG + GA group compared with the TG group at the same dose, p < 0.01.