Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 25;14:213–224. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2023.04.003

Table 1.

Effect of dietary sodium acetate (SA) supplementation on reproductive performance of sows.

Item Treatment group1
SEM P-value
CON SA
Parity 3.43 3.40 0.16 0.912
Total litter size 13.88 13.65 0.61 0.797
Weak offspring 1.03 0.53 0.19 0.065
Stillbirths 0.80 0.55 0.14 0.222
Mummy 0.20 0.25 0.08 0.674
Live births 13.03 13.40 0.53 0.375
Litter weight, kg 18.82 19.55 0.77 0.506
Individual birth weight, kg 1.47 1.47 0.04 0.993
Weaning to estrus interval, d 4.08 4.23 0.11 0.325
ADFI, kg
Week 1 of lactation 3.48 3.51 0.12 0.876
Week 2 of lactation 4.72 4.72 0.17 0.989
Week 3 of lactation 5.60 5.58 0.13 0.889
Lactation 4.60 4.60 0.10 0.991
Sow backfat thickness, mm
Day 85 of gestation 18.60 18.98 0.60 0.663
Day 114 of gestation 17.73 18.18 0.66 0.629
Day 21 of lactation 16.33 17.00 0.62 0.445
Late pregnancy loss, mm 0.88 0.80 0.26 0.839
Lactation loss, mm 1.40 1.18 0.31 0.605

ADFI = average daily feed intake; SEM = standard error of the mean.

1

CON, sows were fed a base diet; SA, sows were fed a basal diet supplemented with 0.1% sodium acetate (n = 40).