Table 3.

Comparison of Garland and Werley wrist scores. Patients with regular follow‐up were selected for analysis. The sample size was 83. The number of patients who achieved excellent and good recovery of joint function 39 in the Wechat group and 23 in the control group. The excellent and good rate was 83.0% in the Wechat group and 63.9% in the control group. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used, showing a statistically significant difference between the two groups

Group	n	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor	EGR	Z	P
Control group	36	13	10	9	4	63.9%	−2.082	0.037
Wechat group	47	25	14	8	0	83.0%