Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2023 Jul 7;9(7):e18063. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18063

Estimation of interaction parameters in the Al-Ga-As-Sn-Bi system

Vladimir Khvostikov 1,, Olga Khvostikova 1, Nataliia Potapovich 1, Alexey Vlasov 1, Roman Salii 1
PMCID: PMC10362131  PMID: 37483788

Abstract

The development of GaAs based high power side-input photovoltaic converters requires thick (50–100 μm) transparent gradient refraction layers that can be grown by liquid phase epitaxy. Such thick layers can also be used in LED structures. To solve the problem of AlxGa1-xAs conductivity reduction at the x∼40% point a five-component, Al-Ga-As-Sn-Bi system is proposed. The interaction parameters in the liquid phase (αij) in the Al-Ga-As-Sn-Bi system are determined within the framework of a quasi-regular solutions model. For an AlxGa1-xAs solid solution growing from a Ga-melt containing 10 at.% of Bi (as a neutral solvent) and 15 at.% of Sn (as an n-type dopant), liquidus and solidus isotherms for 900 °C are modeled based on the calculated αij. Satisfactory agreement between calculated and experimental data has been obtained. Hall data show that AlGaAs layers grown from Bi-containing melts have n-type conductivity. Doping by tin during growth from mixed Ga–Bi melts makes it possible to increase the electron concentration in the AlGaAs layer.

Keywords: Crystal growth, Thermodynamic modeling, Ga–Bi melt, Hall data

1. Introduction

The traditional configuration of a photovoltaic (PV) converter implies the input of radiation through a frontal window located parallel to the p-n junction plane. This approach has fundamental limitations on the power density of the incident radiation. The input of radiation in the direction parallel to the p-n junction (side input) opens up opportunities to break through the limits, but requires a waveguide layer with a thickness of at least 50 μm (wider than a multimode fibre core diameter). Such an approach is realized in the GaInAs/InP system where the InP substrate can act as a waveguide [1]. In the GaAs-AlGaAs system discussed here a wide-gap AlGaAs layer acts as a waveguide. An efficient collection of light towards the p-n junction is provided by the composition gradient x=0.55–0.15 (and, correspondingly, the refractive index) [[2], [3], [4]]. This gradient bends the light beam towards the p-n junction.

Liquid-phase epitaxy (LPE) is the only cost-effective method of obtaining such relatively thick layers, which can also be used in high brightness infrared LEDs [5,6]. This method has another advantage: with a forced decrease in the temperature of the melt solution in the growing AlGaAs layer, a change in the aluminum content occurs due to the dependence of the aluminum segregation coefficient on crystallization temperature. Therefore, when growing a waveguide layer in the Al-Ga-As system by liquid-phase epitaxy, it is possible to create the required band gap gradient, and, as a result, the refractive index gradient of the layer.

To ensure the low Ohmic losses of the PV converter, all layers in the structure, including the substrate, except for the photoactive (diode base) n-type layer, must possess a carrier concentration of at least 5×1017 cm−3. Group IV or group VI elements (e.g. Sn, Te, Se) can be used for this. AlxGa1-xAs layers grown from Ga-melts (the traditional approach) in the x=0.35–0.40 composition range demonstrate a sharp drop in the conductivity [7]. One way to solve this problem is to study the electrical properties of the AlxGa1-xAs alloys grown from Bi-containing melts. Bismuth is used as a neutral solvent, which is an isovalent impurity in AlGaAs. According to Refs. [[8], [9], [10]], an increase in the distribution coefficient of Sn and the electron concentration is observed in GaAs layers crystallized from a Bi melt. This effect can be explained by a change in the ratio of gallium and arsenic in the melt, which promotes the incorporation of Sn into the Ga sublattice, as well as by a change in the distribution coefficient of background impurities.

To date, the properties of the AlxGa1-xAs layers grown from a Bi-containing melt have not been studied. Phase diagrams of Al-Ga-As-Bi and Al-Ga-As-Sn-Bi were modeled only for the case of Bi- and Sn-enriched melts (xGa ≤ 10 at.%) [11]. The purpose of this work is to find the binary interaction parameters αij in the Al-Ga-As-Sn-Bi system for modeling liquidus-solidus isotherms and, using these data, to study the possibility of increasing the doping level of the AlGaAs layer in device structures.

1.1. Theoretical basis

To model the theoretical isotherms, sufficiently accurate interaction parameters (αij) in the liquid phase are required. Interaction parameters in the Al-Ga-As-Sn system without bismuth are provided in Ref. [7]. Here, the calculation of interaction parameters in the liquid phase αAlBi, αBiGa, αAsBi, αBiSn was performed within the framework of the model of quasi-regular solutions, where the interaction parameter αij(Т)=a-bT is a linear function of temperature. A similar approach to estimating αij was used in Refs. [12,13].

α=TΔSfi-ΔHfi-RT·lnxi1xi2=ΔHfiTTfi1RT·lnxi1xi2 (1)

where the i symbol shows the i-side data of the binary phase diagram, ΔSfi, ΔHfi and Tfi – fusion entropy, enthalpy and melting point temperature of i-component, xi – at. fraction of i-component in liquid phase at temperature T, R – universal gas constant.

To calculate the interaction parameter αij by Eq. (1), we used the i-side of the binary diagram of i-j pair, which is characterized by negligible solubility in the solid phase. Table 1 shows the segment of liquidus data of the binary diagram used to estimate αij. Ga–Bi and Al–Bi alloys have a binary diagram with immiscibility region, therefore the liquidus region for calculating αij is even more limited. Since the parameter αij is sensitive to the inaccuracy of the experimental values (T and xi) near the melting point [12,13], this liquidus segment was not used. The enthalpy and melting temperature data of the elements required for the calculation were collected from independent sources [[14], [15], [16]]. To reduce the calculation error, the liquidus data of the binary diagram of each i-j pair from different sources were used [17,18,[19], [20], [21], [22]]. The exception was the Ga–Bi pair, for which detailed liquidus data at xBi=0–8.5 at.% is available [23].

Table 1.

Thermodynamic parameters of i-j pairs.

i-j pair The liquidus segment of the binary diagram used to calculate αij Tfi, K [[14], [15], [16]] ΔHfi, J/mole [[14], [15], [16]]
Al-Bi [17,18]; Al side liquidus 0.54 <xAl < 16 at.%; 623 < T < 923 K 933.3 10,790
Bi-Ga [23]; Bi side liquidus 0.22 <xBi< 8.5 at.%; 373 < T < 493 K 544.3 11,300
As-Bi [19,20]; As side liquidus 0.5< xAs< 80 at.%; 600 < T < 923 K 1090 27,700
Bi-Sn [21,22]; Bi side liquidus 43 <xBi< 80 at.%; 423 < T < 498 K 544.3 11,300

2. Experimental details

To check the accuracy of the derived interaction parameters, the Al-Ga-As-Sn-Bi (xSn=15%, xBi=10%) system was chosen. To compare the liquidus and solidus theoretical curves based on αij estimation, experimental isotherms were obtained at 900 oC. The temperature of 900 oC was chosen because of the need for thick layers. The maximum Sn concentration is limited to 15 at.% in the melt since higher values result in surface morphology degradation. Concentrations of xSn higher than 20 at.% do not lead to a significant increase in the doping level [7]. The content of bismuth in the melt was chosen to be 10 at.% because the solubility of arsenic decreases with increasing xBi in the melt [11]. Despite the fact that this system is considered to be five-component and because the solubility of tin and bismuth in the AlxGa1-xAs solid solution is negligible, the solid phase remains three-component. Bismuth acts as a neutral solvent (isovalent impurity), and tin as a dopant.

To determine the experimental data on the liquidus in the Al-Ga-As-Bi-Sn system, we used the method of melt saturation with arsenic from the GaAs substrate at a constant temperature. To do this, in a slide graphite boat, a melt (5 mm height) of a given composition for bismuth and tin (xBi=10 at.%, xSn=15 at.%, xGa∼70 at.%) with a variable content of xAl was kept at T=900 °C for 50–60 min in contact with a GaAs substrate for saturation with arsenic (Fig. 1a). The substrate and melt components were weighed on a Radwag electronic analytical balance with an accuracy of 0.01 mg. The solubility of arsenic (xAs) was determined from the weight loss of the GaAs (100) substrate during the saturation stage and ranged from tens to several hundreds of milligrams, depending on the aluminum content in the melt. The design of the boat ensured the complete removal of the melt from the substrate surface. The process was carried out in a quartz reactor in a flow of purified hydrogen.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Scheme of melt saturation (a) and layer growth (b) stages.

The experimental values of the solidus curve (x) were determined by the crystallization of the AlxGa1-xAs layer (2–3 μm) from the melt saturated (Fig. 1b) according to the obtained liquidus. The composition of the layers was estimated by means of Raman spectroscopy, which is a fast and reliable method for AlGaAs alloys with an accuracy of 1–2% [24].

3. Results and discussion

Fig. 2 shows the calculated values of the interaction parameters αAlBi, αBiGa, αAsBi, αBiSn according to Eq. (1). Each parameter is calculated in the corresponding temperature range of the liquidus segment (Table 1). Temperature coefficients (a, b) of each interaction parameter αij can be found in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Interaction parameters calculated for i-j-pairs.

The values of the interaction parameters αAlBi, αBiGa, αAsBi, αBiSn found in the literature are collected in Table 2. The discrepancy between the data may be due to the use of different calculation models of αij. In Refs. [10,25] the interaction parameters were determined within the framework of the regularly associated solution model. The interaction parameters in appendix [26] were found by fitting from data of N-shaped GaAs-Bi liquidus. In Ref. [11] the authors do not provide a model for estimating αij nor do they confirm the calculated parameters with experimental data in the Al-Ga-As-Bi-Sn system. The phase diagrams in Ref. [11] were modeled in the Bi-enriched corner (xGa ≤ 10 at.%). When constructing theoretical isotherms for the Ga-enriched corner (Al-Ga-As-Sn-Bi, T=900 °C, xBi=10 at.%, xSn=15 at.%, xGa ≥ 70 at.%) using αij from Ref. [11] a discrepancy with the experimental data of more than 30% was observed. We used binary diagrams refined most recently, which can also affect the difference between the published αij and those obtained in this work.

Table 2.

Interaction parameters in the Al-Ga-As-Sn-Bi system.

αij, cal/mole αAlBi αBiGa αAsBi αBiSn
Published data 2000 + Т [11] 6650-6.5T [11]
3350–3.68T [25]
3420 + 0.44T [26]
6000-T [11]
10,875–8.22T [10]
3840–3.14T [26]
2000 [11]
Data of this work 4680-0.1T 3780-2.4T 4800-3.3T 4.3T-1680

Based on the obtained interaction parameters (Fig. 2), liquidus and solidus curves were modeled assuming that the extrapolated αij values remain unchanged for a temperature of 900 °C. The theoretical liquidus and solidus isotherms were determined using a computer program based on the equations from appendix A (Additional information). Thermodynamic parameters for the calculation of the Al-Ga-As-Sn-Bi phase diagram are given in ibidem. Fig. 3 presents the calculated solidus (curve 1) and the experimental points (hollow dots) of AlxGa1-xAs alloy composition vs the aluminum content in the liquid phase. The calculated liquidus (Fig. 3, curve 2a) and the experimental arsenic solubility points (solid dots) are also marked there.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Solidus (curve 1) and experimental data for Al-Ga-As-Sn-Bi system (hollow dots). Liquidus (curve 2a – calculation based on αAsBi=4800-5.3T, curve 2 b – calculation based on αAsBi=4800-3.3T) and experimental data (solid dots).

The best agreement between the experimental data (solid dots on Fig. 3) and the calculated liquidus (curve 2 b) occurs with the value of αAsBi=4800-3.3T. In this case, all other calculated interaction parameters remain the same. Changing the parameter from αAsBi=4800-5.3T to αAsBi=4800-3.3T has practically no effect on the solidus profile. Final αij values that provide the best agreement between the calculated and the experimental data are collected in Table 2.

Table 3 presents the data for tin doping, where the results for LPE are collected [7,27]. For Hall measurements the n-AlGaAs layers (x=0.2–0.24) were grown by the LPE technique with saturation at 900 °C in a piston graphite boat on the semi-insulating GaAs substrate. The thickness of the grown layers was 3–6 μm, since a greater thickness x of AlxGa1-xAs deviates from the required composition. Hall mobility correlates with the drift mobility through the Hall factor (r) [28]. To avoid uncertainty, we chose the x=0.2–0.24 composition range for doping comparison with r ≅ 1. The carrier concentration was obtained by the four-probe modified van der Pauw method. To do this, we used the installation Ecopia HMS-3000 for measuring the parameters of semiconductor materials on the Hall effect. It is known that the surface of a semi-insulating GaAs substrate changes its conductivity to p-type at temperatures above 900 °C [29]. To avoid additional errors in Hall measurements the semi-insulating substrate was etched (3–6 s) with an arsenic-unsaturated melt before growing the AlGaAs layer to remove the inverse surface layer.

Table 3.

Hall data of AlxGa1-xAs layers.

melt xBi, % xSn, % n, cm−3 Tgrowth, oC Ref.
Ga 0 0 p-type 850 [27]
Ga 0 0 p-type 900 data of this work
Ga–Bi 10 0 (2–3)·1016 900 data of this work
Ga 0 15 (5–6)·1017 800 [7]
Ga 0 15 (2–3)·1017 850 [27]
Ga–Bi 10 15 9·1017 900 data of this work

As can be seen from Table 3, undoped AlGaAs layer, grown from the Ga–Bi melt (without Sn) possesses n-type conductivity, while the use of pure Ga melt reveals the p-type. Thus, adding bismuth to the melt makes it possible to avoid the inversion of the conduction type of AlGaAs layer. The growth from the mixed Ga–Bi melt with added Sn leads to a corresponding increase in the doping level. A similar effect was observed for GaAs layers grown from bismuth melt [8,9]. Bismuth increases arsenic activity (effective concentration). Changing the ratio in the liquid phase of III/V groups contributes to the reduction of acceptor native defects (VAs, GaAs, CAs) [10]. Replacing the solvent (Ga by Bi) during the crystallization of undoped GaAs makes it possible to obtain low-compensated layers even at a high growth temperature T ∼ 900 oC [10], where the level of doping with background impurities of the growing layer increases. Since carbon (p-type dopant) is the main background impurity in liquid phase epitaxy with the use of a graphite boat, the task of reducing the doping level of this impurity becomes especially important when growing relatively thick AlGaAs structures, because melt homogenization and layer crystallization occur at sufficiently high temperatures T > 900 oC. Thus, the use of mixed Ga–Bi melts provides an opportunity to reduce background doping and ohmic losses (Table 3).

4. Conclusion

Based on the αij values obtained, theoretical isotherms of the five-component system (Al-Ga-As-Sn-Bi, T=900 °C, xSn=15 at.%, xBi=10 at.%) were modeled and confirmed by experimental data. AlGaAs layers grown from Ga–Bi melts did not change the type of conductivity even without Sn. Doping by tin of AlxGa1-xAs solid solutions from mixed melts leads to increase n-type conductivity in grown layer. This study is of high practical importance for the growth of highly efficient side-input photovoltaic converters of laser radiation [[2], [3], [4],30] and high brightness infrared LEDs [5,6]. The use of Bi-containing melts reduces background doping, which makes it possible, by using Sn, to keep the doping level constant in a thick (more than 50 μm) gradient composition AlGaAs layers to ensure low Ohmic losses of some optoelectronic devices.

Author contribution statement

Vladimir Khvostikov, Olga Khvostikova: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.

Nataliia Potapovich, Alexey Vlasov, Roman Salii: Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data.

Data availability statement

No data was used for the research described in the article.

Additional information

Supplementary content related to this article has been published online at.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (https://rscf.ru/en/project/22-19-00057/) under Grant 22-19-00057.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18063.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article.

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (39.1KB, docx)

References

  • 1.Nagatsuma T., Ito H., Ishibashi T. High-power RF photodiodes and their applications. Laser Photon. Rev. 2009;3(1–2):123–137. doi: 10.1002/lpor.200810024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.P Khvostikov V., Pokrovskiy P.V., Khvostikova O.A., Panchak A.N., Andreev V.M. High-efficiency AlGaAs/GaAs photovoltaic converters with edge input of laser light. Tech. Phys. Lett. 2018;44:776–778. doi: 10.1134/S1063785018090079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Panchak А., Khvostikov V., Pokrovskiy P. AlGaAs gradient waveguides for vertical p/n junction GaAs laser power converters. Opt Laser. Technol. 2021;136 doi: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2020.106735. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Khvostikov V.P., Vlasov A.S., Pokrovskiy P.V., Khvostikova O.A., Panchak A.N., Marukhina E.P., Kalyuzhnyy N.A., Andreev V.M. Characterization of ultra high power laser beam PV converters. AIP Conf. Proc., Fes, Morocco. 2019;2149 doi: 10.1063/1.5124213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zinovchuk V., Malyutenko O., Malyutenko V., Podoltsev A., Vilisov A. The effect of current crowding on the heat and light pattern in high-power AlGaAs light emitting diodes. J. Appl. Phys. 2008;104 doi: 10.1063/1.2968220. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kitabayashi H., Ishihara K., Kawabata Y., Matsubara H., Miyahara K., Morishita T., Tanaka S. Development of super high brightness infrared LEDs. SEI Tech. Rev. 2011;72:86–89. https://sumitomoelectric.com/sites/default/files/2020-12/download_documents/72-12.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Panish M.B. Phase equilibria in the system Al–Ga–As–Sn and electrical properties of Sn‐doped liquid phase epitaxial AlxGa1−xAs. J. Appl. Phys. 1973;44:2667–2675. doi: 10.1063/1.1662631. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yakusheva N.A., Beloborodov G.M. Doping of GaAs with tin in the process of liquid-phase epitaxy from bismuth melt. Izv. Acad. Nauk SSSR Inorg. Mater. 1990;26:9–13. (in Russian) [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yakusheva N.A., Pogadaev V.G. Doping of GaAs with donor impurities Te and Sn during liquid phase epitaxy from mixed gallium bismuth melts. Cryst. Res. Technol. 1992;27:21–30. doi: 10.1002/crat.2170270104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yakusheva N.A., Zhuravlev K.S., Chikichev S.I., Shegay O.A. Liquid phase epitaxial growth of undoped gallium arsenide from bismuth and gallium melts. Cryst. Res. Technol. 1989;24:235–246. doi: 10.1002/crat.2170240221. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Antoschenko V.S., Francev Yu V., Lavrischev O.A., Antoschenko E.V. Investigation of phase equilibriain the quinary system Sn-Bi-Ga-Al-As. KazNU Bull. Phys. series. 2013;44:11–17. https://bph.kaznu.kz/index.php/zhuzhu/article/view/65 (in Russian) [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Thurmond C.D., Kowalchik M. Germanium and silicon liquidus curves. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1960;39:169–204. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1960.tb03927.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Safarian J., Kolbeinsen L., Tangstad M. Liquidus of silicon binary systems. Metall. Mater. Trans. B. 2011;42:852–874. doi: 10.1007/s11663-011-9507-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.2023. https://material-properties.org ([online available] Material Properties)
  • 15.2023. https://periodictable.com ([online available] Material Properties)
  • 16.Dinsdale A.T. SGTE data for pure elements. Calphad. 1991;15:317–425. doi: 10.1016/0364-5916(91)90030-N. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Okamoto H. Supplemental literature review of binary phase diagrams: Al-Bi, Al-Dy, Al-Gd, Al-Tb, C-Mn, Co-Ga, Cr-Hf, Cr-Na, Er-H, Er-Zr, H-Zr, and Ni-Pb. J. Phase Equilibria Diffus. 2014;35:343–354. doi: 10.1007/s11669-014-0300-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Paliwal M., Jung I.H. Thermodynamic modeling of the Al–Bi, Al–Sb, Mg–Al–Bi and Mg–Al–Sb systems. Calphad. 2010;34:51–63. doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2009.11.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Okamoto H., Schlesinger M.E., Mueller E.M. In: Alloy Phase Diagram Committee. Rev, editor. ASM Metals; Park, OH: 2016. pp. 337–338. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Predel B. Landolt-Börnstein; 1991. Phase Equilibria. Crystallographic and Thermodynamic Data of Binary Alloys Ac-Au – Au-Zr, IV-5A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vianco P.T., Rejent J.A. Mater. Properties of ternary Sn-Ag-Bi solder alloys: Part I - thermal properties and microstructural analysis. J. Electron. 1999;28:1127–1137. doi: 10.1007/s11664-999-0250-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Braga M.H., Vizdal J., Kroupa A., Ferreira J., Soares D., Malheiro L.F. The experimental study of the Bi–Sn, Bi–Zn and Bi–Sn–Zn systems. Calphad. 2007;31:468–478. doi: 10.1016/j.calphad.2007.04.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Turchanin A., Freyland W., Nattland D. Surface freezing in a liquid eutectic Ga–Bi alloy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2002;4:647–654. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(01)00185-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lockwood D.J., Wasilewski Z.R. Optical phonons in AlxGa1−xAs: Raman spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B. 2004;70 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.155202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jourdan A.S. Calculation of phase equilibria in the Ga-Bi and Ga-P-Bi systems based on a theory of regular associated solutions. Metall. Trans. B. 1976;7:191–201. doi: 10.1007/BF02654917. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hurle D.T.J. A thermodynamic analysis of native point defect and dopant solubilities in zinc-blende III–V semiconductors. J. Appl. Phys. 2010;107 doi: 10.1063/1.3386412. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhao X., Montgomery K.H., Woodall J.M. Hall effect studies of AlGaAs grown by liquid phase epitaxy for tandem solar cell applications. J. Electron. Mater. 2014;43(11):3999–4002. doi: 10.1007/s11664-014-3340-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Saxena A.K. Hall to drift mobility ratio in Ga1−xAlxAs alloys. Solid State Commun. 1981;39:839–842. doi: 10.1016/0038-1098(81)90526-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nouiri A., Sayad Y., Djemel A. Study of acceptor centers in GaAs after high temperature annealing. Exp. Calculation, Phys. Stat. Sol. 2003;0(2):665–668. doi: 10.1002/pssc.200306208. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Khvostikov V.P., Panchak A.N., Khvostikova O.A., Pokrovskiy P.V. Side-input GaAs laser power converters with gradient AlGaAs waveguide. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2022;43:1717–1719. doi: 10.1109/LED.2022.3202987. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (39.1KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

No data was used for the research described in the article.


Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES