Table 10.
Spatial econometric model results of sub-sample cities in east, central and west.
| VARIABLES | Eastern Region (SEM) |
Central Region (SDM) |
Western Region (SDM) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 19 |
Model 20 |
Model 21 |
Model 22 |
Model 23 |
Model 24 |
|
| env | env | env | env | env | env | |
| lnP | −0.187 | −0.00506 | 0.0554*** | 0.0854*** | 0.193*** | 0.174*** |
| (−1.31) | (−0.03) | (3.80) | (3.45) | (4.31) | (4.26) | |
| FDI | −1.211** | −0.999* | 6.701*** | 7.272*** | 30.51*** | 29.02*** |
| (−2.49) | (−1.96) | (7.31) | (9.09) | (5.31) | (5.09) | |
| FIR | −0.0437*** | 0.0974*** | 0.0544* | |||
| (−3.69) | (3.73) | (1.91) | ||||
| FE | −0.232*** | 0.0158** | 0.755*** | |||
| (−3.71) | (2.22) | (9.25) | ||||
| ρ | 0.738*** | 0.716*** | −0.261*** | −0.382*** | ||
| (41.29) | (32.29) | (−3.44) | (−4.26) | |||
| λ | 0.159* | 0.185** | ||||
| (1.77) | (2.22) | |||||
| WFIR | −0.346*** | 0.215* | ||||
| (−7.60) | (1.95) | |||||
| WFE | 0.113** | 2.797*** | ||||
| (2.14) | (3.92) | |||||
| WlnP | −0.198** | −0.477*** | −0.0627 | 0.518*** | ||
| (−2.43) | (−2.77) | (−0.24) | (3.45) | |||
| WFDI | −7.589* | −3.958 | −41.92*** | −41.12*** | ||
| (−1.69) | (−0.58) | (−3.30) | (−6.55) | |||
| Direct Effect | 0.0863*** | 0.0208** | 0.0531* | 0.715*** | ||
| (3.19) | (2.55) | (1.79) | (7.41) | |||
| Indirect Effect | −1.039*** | 0.416** | 0.162* | 1.832*** | ||
| (−6.10) | (2.54) | (1.75) | (3.69) | |||
| Total Effect | −0.953*** | 0.437*** | 0.216** | 2.547*** | ||
| (−5.44) | (2.60) | (2.55) | (6.21) | |||
| R-squared | 0.037 | 0.027 | 0.038 | 0.003 | 0.195 | 0.199 |
| Log-likelihood | −180.8494 | −182.0266 | −839.5008 | −845.2972 | −710.9636 | −705.0165 |
| AIC | 371.6987 | 374.0532 | 1695.002 | 1706.594 | 1437.927 | 1426.033 |
Notes: t statistics in parentheses ⁎ p < 0.1, ⁎⁎ p < 0.05, ⁎⁎⁎ p < 0.01.