Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 4;9(7):e17876. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17876

Table 6.

Risk factors analysis of orthostatic hypotension and levodopa-induced orthostatic hypotension in the levodopa challenge test.

Characteristics “Off state” OH (n = 19)
Best “on state” OH (n = 25)
Univariable OR (95% CI) P value Multivariable OR (95% CI) P value Univariable OR (95% CI) P value Multivariable OR (95% CI) P value
Cognitive impairment 10.64 (1.284,88.169) 0.028 70.117 (3.262,1507.273) 0.007 −0.964 (0.298,3.118) 0.952
“Off- state” OH 64.579 (6.835,610.116) 0.000 0.087 (0.019,0.396) 0.002
Best “on-state” OH
History of Hypertension 20.07 (0.955,421.766) 0.049 7.777 (0.833,72.569) 0.072 0.762 (0.250,2.319) 0.632
Urinary incontinence 0.284 (0.067,1.200) 0.087 0.121 (0.035,0.422) 0.001 0.158 (0.038, 0.655) 0.011

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with OH occurrence. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; OH, orthostatic hypotension; “off-state,” defined as the period when all anti-PD drugs were withdrawn for at least 12 h; best “on-state,” defined as the peak of anti-PD drug benefit in the morning. P-values with statistical significance (<0.05) are in bold.