Skip to main content
. 2023 May 1;73(4):393–400. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2023.04.004

Table 3.

Comparisons of intubating conditions according to device that reached TOFC of zero first.

Device that reached TOFC of zero first
TetraGraph
(n = 25)
TOFScan
(n = 57)
Totala
(n = 100)
p-value
Jaw relaxation 1.00
Easy 20 (80.0%) 44 (77.2%) 81 (81.0%)
Fair 5 (20.0%) 13 (22.8%) 19 (19.0%)
Vocal cord position 0.90
Abducted 23 (92.0%) 53 (93.0%) 93 (93.0%)
Intermediate 2 (8.0%) 3 (5.3%) 6 (6.0%)
Closed 0 (0.0%) 1 (1.8%) 1 (1.0%)
Vocal cord movement 0.10
None 23 (92.0%) 43 (75.4%) 80 (80.0%)
Moving 1 (4.0%) 13 (22.8%) 18 (18.0%)
Closing 1 (4.0%) 1 (1.8%) 2 (2.0%)
Airway reaction 0.19
None 21 (84.0%) 54 (94.7%) 93 (93.0%)
Diaphragm 4 (16.0%) 3 (5.3%) 7 (7.0%)
Movement of the limbs 1.00
None 21 (84.0%) 49 (86.0%) 88 (88.0%)
Slight 4 (16.0%) 8 (14.0%) 12 (12.0%)
Total score 0.75
5 16 (64.0%) 31 (54.4%) 60 (60.0%)
6 2 (8.0%) 17 (29.8%) 23 (23.0%)
7 5 (20.0%) 4 (7.0%) 10 (10.0%)
8 2 (8.0%) 3 (5.3%) 5 (5.0%)
9 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
10 0 (0.0%) 2 (3.5%) 2 (2.0%)

TOFC, Train-Of-Four Count.

p-values result from a Wilcoxon rank sum test (ordinal categorical variables) or Fisher's exact test (binary categorical variables).

a

Total number includes 18 patients in which both devices reached TOFC.