Skip to main content
letter
. 2023 Jul 21;25:124. doi: 10.1186/s13075-023-03113-8

Table 2.

Baseline and follow-up changes in LV remodeling categories

LV remodeling categories* Baseline % (n = 153) Longitudinal subset at baseline (n = 58) % (n) Longitudinal subset at follow-up (n = 58)
% (n)
Baseline subset (n = 53) vs. follow-up subset (n = 53); p-value**
Normal geometry 78% (119) 60% (35) 40% (23) 0.15
CRM 13% (20) 10.3% (6) 31% (18) 0.0088
CH 1.3% (2) 1.7% (1) 3.4% (2) Null***
EH 7.8% (12) 17% (10) 15% (9) 0.48

Concentric remodeling (CRM): relative wall thickness (RWT) > 0.42 and LVMI < 90% tile

Concentric hypertrophy (CH): RWT > 0.42 and LVMI > 90% tile

Eccentric hypertrophy (EH): RWT < 0.42 and LVMI > 90% tile

*Normal geometry: RWT < 0.42 and LVMI < 90% tile

**McNemar’s test

***Unable to calculate p-value due to small numbers