Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 22;23:260. doi: 10.1186/s12906-023-04038-0

Table 12.

Quality of evidence based on GRADE approach

Certainty assessment № of patients Effect Certainty Importance
№ of Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations Treatment Control Absolute
study (95% CI)
TG Randomized trials Serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None 362 339 SMD 0.66 SD lower ⨁⨁⨁◯ important
15 (1.17 lower to 0.16 lower) Moderate
TC Randomized trials Serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None 320 297 SMD 0.43 SD lower ⨁⨁⨁◯ important
14 (0.86 lower to 0.01 lower) Moderate
LDL Randomized trials Serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None 300 277 SMD 0.44 SD lower ⨁⨁⨁◯ important
13 (0.88 lower to 0.01 lower) Moderate
HDL Randomized trials Serious Not serious Not serious Not serious Publication bias strongly suspected 362 339 SMD 0.1 SD higher ⨁⨁◯◯ important
15 (0.28 lower to 0.48 higher) Low
SBP Randomized trials Serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None 206 217 SMD 0.56 SD lower ⨁⨁⨁◯ important
9 (1.58 lower to 0.47 higher) Moderate
DBP Randomized trials Serious Not serious Not serious Not serious None 206 217 SMD 1.33 SD lower ⨁⨁⨁◯ important
9 (2.14 lower to 0.53 lower) Moderate

CI Confidence interval, SMD Standard mean difference