Table 4.
Meta-analysis of the effect of garlic on TG
| Study | SMD (95% CI) | Weight % |
|---|---|---|
| Adler, A. J., 1997 [20] | -3.15 (-4.44, -1.87) | 5.11 |
| Aslani, N., 2016 [21] | -0.54 (-1.07, 0.00) | 7.03 |
| Byrne, DJ., 1999 [23] | -0.09 (-0.82, 0.65) | 6.57 |
| Gardner, CD., 2001 [24] | -0.13 (-0.70, 0.44) | 6.96 |
| Higashikawa, Fumiko., 2012 [25] | -0.33 (-0.87, 0.21) | 7.03 |
| Isaacsohn, JL., 1998 [26] | -0.30 (-0.91, 0.32) | 6.86 |
| Jain, AK., 1993 [27] | 0.10 (-0.50, 0.71) | 6.88 |
| Jung, ES.,2014 [28] | -0.40 (-0.93, 0.14) | 7.04 |
| Kannar, D., 2001 [29] | 0.54 (-0.09, 1.17) | 6.84 |
| Peleg, A., 2003 [31] | 0.90 (-0.14, 1.94) | 5.77 |
| Riad, Karin., 2018 [32] | -0.93 (-1.38, -0.48) | 7.2 |
| Sangouni, Abbas Ali., 2021 [14] | -3.19 (-3.83, -2.56) | 6.82 |
| Sangouni, Abbas Ali., 2020 [33] | -0.34 (-0.90, 0.22) | 6.98 |
| Sharifi, F., 2010 [34] | -2.35 (-3.17, -1.54) | 6.37 |
| Simons, LA., 1995 [35] | 0.25 (-0.99, 0.49) | 6.56 |
| Overall (I-squared = 89.5%, p=0.000) | -0.66 (-1.17, -0.16) | 100 |