Table 2.
Blood-feeding results of wild, pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae s.l. collected in experimental huts with pyrethroid-chlorfenapyr nets and pyrethroid-piperonyl butoxide nets applied alone and in combination in Covè, Benin
Trial component | Treatment | N* | N blood-fed | % Blood-feeding* | 95% CIs | % Blood-feeding inhibition | % Personal protection |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trial 1* | |||||||
Single nets | Untreated net | 835ab | 574 | 68.7a | 65.6–71.8 | – | – |
Interceptor | 352c | 136 | 38.6b | 33.5–43.7 | 43.8 | 76.3 | |
DuraNet Plus | 644de | 111 | 17.2c | 14.3–20.1 | 75.0 | 80.7 | |
Interceptor G2 | 309c | 72 | 23.3d | 18.6–28.0 | 66.1 | 87.5 | |
Double net combinations | Untreated net + Untreated net | 1423f | 1101 | 77.4e | 75.2–79.6 | – | – |
Interceptor + Interceptor | 659ad | 337 | 51.1f | 47.3–54.9 | 34.0 | 69.4 | |
DuraNet Plus + DuraNet Plus | 836a | 196 | 23.4d | 20.5–26.3 | 69.8 | 82.2 | |
Interceptor G2 + Interceptor G2 | 495be | 156 | 31.5b | 27.4–35.6 | 59.3 | 85.8 | |
Interceptor G2 + Interceptor | 569be | 267 | 46.9f | 42.8–51.0 | 39.4 | 75.7 | |
Interceptor G2 + DuraNet Plus | 574be | 124 | 21.6d | 18.2–25.0 | 72.1 | 88.7 | |
Trial 2* | |||||||
Single nets | Untreated net | 179vw | 101 | 56.4w | 49.1–63.7 | – | – |
PermaNet 3.0 | 213vwy | 49 | 23.0x | 17.4–28.7 | 59.2 | 51.5 | |
Interceptor G2 | 195vw | 81 | 41.5y | 34.6–48.4 | 26.4 | 19.8 | |
PermaNet Dual | 164w | 69 | 42.1y | 34.5–49.7 | 25.4 | 31.7 | |
Double net combinations | Untreated net + Untreated net | 466z | 273 | 58.6z | 54.1–63.1 | – | – |
PermaNet 3.0 + PermaNet 3.0 | 289vwy | 30 | 10.4x | 6.9–13.9 | 82.3 | 89.0 | |
PermaNet Dual + PermaNet Dual | 351xz | 105 | 29.9y | 25.1–34.7 | 49.0 | 61.5 | |
PermaNet Dual + PermaNet 3.0 | 281y | 35 | 12.5x | 8.6–16.4 | 78.7 | 87.2 |
*Results are presented separately for trials involving alpha-cypermethrin-based nets (trial 1) and deltamethrin-based nets (trial 2)
*For each trial, values in the same column do not differ at the 5% level (p > 0.05) according to logistic regression analysis