Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 13;42:54–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.07.005

Table 2.

Stability and PAT outcomes following different surgical interventions.

Study Intervention Pre-operative patella stability score Post-operative patella stability score Pre-operative PAT Post-operative PAT Stability outcomes
Malecki et al., 201628 Group 1: MPFL reconstruction
Group 2: Combination of: retinacular plasty, vastus medialis advancement, and Roux-Goldthwait procedure
NR Group 1:
Kujala score: 90.8
Lysholm score: 89.8
Group 2:
Kujala score: 85
Lysholm score: 84.2
All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively 6 patients in group 1 (19%) and 6 in group 2 (18%) noted a positive PAT Group 1: 3 dislocations noted
Group 2: 4 dislocations noted
Leite et al., 202132 Tibial tubercle osteotomy with concomitant distalization and MPFL reconstruction Kujala score: 52 Kujala score: 77 All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively All patients had a negative PAT pre-operatively J-sign improved in 30 cases (97%). One case (3%) of recurrent instability was reported
Sadigursky et al., 201733 MPFL and medial patellotibial ligament reconstruction Kujala score: 42.57
Lysholm score: 33.71
Kujala score: 88.57
Lysholm score: 87.71
All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively All patients had a negative PAT post-operatively J-sign was noted in 6 patients pre-operatively (85.7%), compared to 1 post-operatively (14.3%)
Akgün et al., 201020 Fulkerson osteotomy NR Kujala score: 82.6 All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively PAT was negative in 14 knees (82.4%), and positive in three (17.6%) Subluxation was noted in 2 knees (11.8%). Patellar tilt and subluxation were corrected in all but two knees.
Wang et al., 201049 Group 1 (MPFLR): 28
Group 2 (MPFLR and vastus medialis advancement): 41
Kujala score:
Group 1: 51.3
Group 2: 53.7
Kujala score:
Group 1: 79.9
Group 2: 83.9
All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively Group 1: 20 had a negative PAT (71.4%)
Group 2: 38 had a negative PAT (92.7%)
Recurrent dislocation was not reported in any patient post-operatively
Torkaman et al., 201535 MPFLR Kujala score: 59.8 Kujala score: 88.6 All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively All patients had a negative PAT post-operatively NR
Xu and Zhao, 201121 Arthroscopic medial retinaculum plication Kujala score: 66.7
Lysholm score: 52.6
Kujala score: 76.6
Lysholm score: 70.7
All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively. At 2 years follow-up, 12 demonstrated a positive PAT (42.9%). Six patients suffered from redislocation (21.4%), and 23 patients experienced patella instability (82.1%).
Ma et al., 201216 Group 1: Medial capsule reefing
Group 2: Medial patellar retinaculum plasty
Kujala score:
Group 1: 52.3
Group 2: 53.5
Kujala score:
Group 1: 78.1
Group 2: 82.2
All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively Group 1: 20 patients had a negative PAT (68.9%)
Group 2:
30 patients had a negative PAT (93.8%)
Medial retinacular plasty was better than medial capsule reefing in decreasing the rate of patellar dislocation
Fink et al., 201436 MPFLR Kujala score: NR
Lysholm score: 69.5
Kujala score: 89.2
Lysholm score: 88.1
All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively Fifteen patients had a negative PAT (88.2%) No dislocation during the follow-up period
Song et al., 201437 MPFLR Kujala score: 52.6
Lysholm score: 49.2
Kujala score: 90.9
Lysholm score: 90.9
All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively Nineteen patients had a negative PAT (95%) No patient experience a redislocation
Ellera Gomes et al., 200438 MPFLR NR NR All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively Fifteen patients had a negative PAT (93.8%) Patellar tracking was normal in 14 knees (87.5%)
Ntagiopoulos et al., 201339 Sulcus-deepening trochleoplasty Kujala score: 59 Kujala score: 87 PAT was positive in 30 knees (96.7%) PAT was positive in 6 knees (19.4%)
PAT was negative in 25 knees (80.6%)
No recurrence was observed
Beckert et al., 201640 Lateral patellofemoral ligament reconstruction NR NR All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively All patients had a negative PAT post-operatively No recurrence of patellar instability was observed
Calanna et al., 201641 MPFLR Kujala score: 65.2
Lysholm score: 64.3
Kujala score: 94.7
Lysholm score: 94.7
PAT was positive in 17 patients (89%) PAT was positive in 2 cases (11%) No recurrence of patellar dislocation was reported
Fadel and Hosni, 202027 MPFLR Kujala score: 69.5 Kujala score: 94.8 All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively All patients had a negative PAT post-operatively No recurrence of patellar dislocation was reported
Yang et al., 201723 MPFLR NR NR All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively All patients had a negative PAT post-operatively No recurrence of patellar dislocation was reported
Watanabe et al., 200819 Group 1: MPFLR
Group 2: MPFLR + tibial tubercle transfer
Lysholm score:
Group 1: 70
Group 2: 72
Lysholm score:
Group 1: 92
Group 2: 90
Group 1: 28 had a positive PAT (97%)
Group 2: 11 had a positive PAT (92%)
Group 1: 6 had a positive PAT (21%)
Group 2: 4 had a positive PAT (31%)
NR
Elbarbary et al., 202042 MPFLR Tegner-Lysholm score: 63 Tegner-Lysholm score: 89.2 All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively All patients had a negative PAT post-operatively No redislocations were reported
Kang et al., 201443 MPFLR Kujala score: 52.4
Lysholm score: 51.8
Kujala score: 90.9
Lysholm score: 91.7
All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively All patients had a negative PAT post-operatively No redislocations were reported
Niu et al., 201726 MPFLR Kujala score: 58.9
Lysholm score: 53.3
Kujala score: 92
Lysholm score: 91.6
All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively All patients had a negative PAT post-operatively No redislocations were reported
Chen et al., 201522 Tibial tubercle internal rotation Kujala score: 56.9
Lysholm score: 51.6
Kujala score: 89.0
Lysholm score: 89.0
All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively All patients had a negative PAT post-operatively No redislocations were reported
Li et al., 201817 Lateral retinacular release and MPFLR Lysholm score: 68.3 Lysholm score: 92.9 All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively All patients had a negative PAT post-operatively No redislocations were reported
Camathias et al., 201644 Trochleoplasty Kujala score: 71 Kujala score: 92 Positive PAT in 41 knees (82%) Positive PAT in 8 knees (16%) One patella dislocated post-operatively (2%)
Mochizuki et al., 201918 MPFLR Kujala score: 50.9 Kujala score: 93.7 All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively One patient had a positive PAT (4.2%) No redislocations were reported
Mahmoud et al., 202145 MPFLR Lysholm score: 59 Lysholm score: 80.2 All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively All patients had a negative PAT post-operatively No redislocations were reported
Kumahashi et al., 201646 MPFLR Kujala score: 72.2
Lysholm score: 67.8
Kujala score: 96.4
Lysholm score: 96.2
All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively One patient had a positive PAT post-operatively (5.9%) No redislocations were reported
Kumahashi et al., 201229 MPFLR Kujala score: 67.4
Lysholm score: 64.4
Kujala score: 95.4
Lysholm score: 96.0
All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively All patients had a negative PAT post-operatively No redislocations were reported
Schöttle et al. 200547 MPFLR Kujala score: 53.3 Kujala score: 85.7 Fourteen knees had a positive PAT (93%) Three knees remained with a positive PAT (20%) 86.7% reported to recurrent instability
Kita et al., 201248 MPFLR Kujala score: 73 Kujala score: 95 All patients had a positive PAT pre-operatively 22 knees had a negative PAT (88%) Patellar maltracking was corrected in all patients