Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 18;15:699–706. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S418009

Table 1.

Summary of Clinical Trials

Trial Objective Patient Population Key Findings
EV-101
n= 112
Phase I study evaluating safety and efficacy Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) Objective Response Rate = 42%
Common ADRs: decreased appetite, weakness, alopecia
EV-201
n= 125
Safety and efficacy evaluation Locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma Objective Response rate = 44%
Common ADRs: fatigue, baldness, reduced appetite, dysgeusia, peripheral sensory neuropathy
EV-301
n= 608
Overall survival comparison Locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer Longer median overall survival in the enfortumab vedotin group compared to the chemotherapy group
NCT03070990
n= 26
Safety and pharmacokinetics evaluation Japanese patients with urothelial carcinoma Objective response rate: 35.3%
EV-302 Comparison of enfortumab vedotin + pembrolizumab Locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma Ongoing trial
MK-3475-905/KEYNOTE-905/EV-303 Effectiveness of pembrolizumab or enfortumab vedotin combination Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) Ongoing trial
MORPHEUS mUC Evaluation of pembrolizumab or enfortumab vedotin combination Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) Ongoing trial

Abbreviations: ADRs, Adverse Reactions; mUC, Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC); MIBC, Muscle-invasive bladder cancer.