Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 18;16:1297–1307. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S395694

Table 4.

Number of Participants Who Reported the Practice of Burning Household Waste in Their Neighborhood and Estimated Population Exposed to the Risk of Burning Household Waste

Locality Samplea Burning % Practicing Burningc Population
Yesb No Exposedd Totale
Omdurman 74 64 10 86.5 662,148 765,609
Jabal Awliya 10 8 2 80.0 1,125,004 1,406,254
Khartoum Bahri 248 189 59 76.2 692,328 908,452
Khartoum 471 344 127 73.0 697,043 954,382
Um Badda 27 19 8 70.4 1,037,609 1,474,497
Sharg En Nile 14 9 5 64.3 832,766 1,295,414
Six localities 844 633 211 74.6 5,046,899 6,804,608

Notes: aTotal number of participants per locality who address the question related to burning household waste. bNumber of participants who reported that household waste was burnt in their respective neighborhood. cPercentage practicing waste burning obtained as 2/1 x 100. dPopulation exposed to the risks related to burning household waste. It was obtained as 5 x 3/100. eTotal population of 2022 per locality obtained by projecting the 2008 census population of the concerned locality in using the formula Pop2008 x (1+2.9/100)14 where 2.9/100 was Sudan population growth rate and 14 was the number of years between 2008 and 2022.