Table 2.
Comparison of Actigraphy and PSG Sleep Parameters
| Sleep parameter | PSG | Actigraphy | Mean bias | Absolute bias | T statistic | Effect size | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ±SD | Mean ±SD | Mean ±SD | Mean ±SD | ||||
| GGIR: Actigraphy with sleep diary (n = 835) | |||||||
| TST, hours | 5.95 ± 0.96 | 6.54 ± 0.84 | 0.6 ± 0.86 | 0.78 ± 0.70 | 19.99 | 0.69 | <0.001 |
| SOL, hours | 0.29 ± 0.33 | 0.05 ± 0.17 | −0.24 ± 0.35 | 0.27 ± 0.32 | −20.09 | −0.7 | <0.001 |
| WASO, hours | 1.25 ± 0.71 | 0.9 ± 0.61 | −0.35 ± 0.74 | 0.60 ± 0.55 | −13.72 | −0.47 | <0.001 |
| SE, % | 78.0 ± 11.51 | 87.21 ± 9.45 | 9.21 ± 12.1 | 11.54 ± 9.9 | 22.00 | 0.76 | <0.001 |
| GGIR: Actigraphy without sleep diary (n = 832) | |||||||
| TST, hours | 5.95 ± 0.95 | 6.4 ± 1.21 | 0.44 ± 1.15 | 0.91 ± 0.84 | 11.03 | 0.38 | <0.001 |
| WASO, hours | 1.24 ± 0.7 | 0.77 ± 0.54 | −0.47 ± 0.77 | 0.66 ± 0.61 | −17.46 | −0.61 | <0.001 |
| SE, % | 78.09 ± 11.36 | 88.67 ± 7.48 | 10.58 ± 11.86 | 12.18 ± 10.21 | 25.72 | 0.89 | <0.001 |
| ActiLife: Actigraphy with sleep diary (n = 831) | |||||||
| TST, hours | 5.95 ± 0.96 | 6.73 ± 0.76 | 0.78 ± 0.84 | 0.87 ± 0.75 | 27.00 | 0.94 | <0.001 |
| SOL, hours | 0.29 ± 0.33 | 0.07 ± 0.08 | −0.23 ± 0.34 | 0.25 ± 0.33 | −19.47 | −0.68 | <0.001 |
| WASO, hours | 1.25 ± 0.71 | 0.73 ± 0.5 | −0.52 ± 0.71 | 0.65 ± 0.59 | −21.23 | −0.74 | <0.001 |
| SE, % | 77.99 ± 11.54 | 89.54 ± 6.66 | 11.55 ± 11.02 | 12.34 ± 10.13 | 30.21 | 1.05 | <0.001 |
Comparisons were made using paired t-tests.
The sample of actigraphy files assessed in GGIR without a sleep diary was reduced by three participants due to TST being calculated as <2 hours, as per exclusion criteria (n = 832).
The sample of actigraphy files processed in ActiLife was reduced by four participants as there was an error with their data being formatted into 60-second epochs (sample, n= 831).