Table 3.
Nucleus segmentation model DICE results comparing to other methods. * indicates that the results were obtained from Ref. 5.
| Methods | TNBC | All CoNSeP | CoNSeP test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-deep learning | Cell Profiler* | — | — | 0.434 |
| QuPath* | — | — | 0.588 | |
| Deep Learning | FCN8 + WS* | 0.726 | 0.609 | — |
| SegNet + WS* | 0.758 | 0.681 | — | |
| U-Net* | 0.681 | 0.585 | — | |
| Mask-RCNN* | 0.705 | 0.606 | — | |
| DCAN* | 0.725 | 0.609 | — | |
| Micro-Net* | 0.701 | 0.644 | — | |
| DIST* | 0.719 | 0.621 | — | |
| HoVer-Net* | 0.749 | 0.664 | — | |
| NuKit | 0.793 | 0.854 | 0.860 |