Table 2.
Analytic Method | Potential Issues to Consider |
---|---|
Complete case analysis | Not recommended |
Least rigorous approach to addressing missingness | |
Produces biased estimates of cost and effectiveness if data are MAR and MNAR | |
Reduces statistical power in analysis | |
Complete case resampling is not recommended in generating cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. | |
Carry-forward imputation | Rarely recommended |
Produces biased estimates of cost and effectiveness if data are MAR and MNAR | |
Imposes relatively strong assumptions on the longitudinal values of missing data | |
Introduces bias if trial data are affected by differential attrition or missingness between treatment arms | |
Introduces bias if cost and effectiveness data are correlated | |
No standard procedure recommended in combining carry-forward imputation with the nonparametric bootstrap | |
Linear imputation | Rarely recommended |
Only applicable for nonmonotonically missing longitudinal data | |
Produces biased estimates of cost and effectiveness if data are MAR and MNAR | |
Assumes missing data evolve linearly between nonmissing data points | |
Introduces bias if cost and effectiveness data are correlated | |
No standard procedure recommended in combining linear imputation with the nonparametric bootstrap | |
Single-regression imputation | Rarely recommended |
Requires “correct” imputation model to be identified | |
Does not account for uncertainty in imputed values of missing data | |
May over or underestimate the correlation between cost and effectiveness variables | |
No standard procedure recommended in combining single regression imputation with the nonparametric bootstrap | |
Inverse probability weighting | Standard 2-step estimation procedure does not guarantee a balanced sample. |
Requires compete data on all covariates to estimate the initial probability model | |
Propensity scores may exhibit high variance. | |
Probability models (e.g., logit or probit) may be affected by partial separation when dichotomous explanatory variables are highly correlated with incomplete cases. | |
Multiple imputation | Requires “correct” imputation model to be identified |
No standard method recommended to ensure that each multiply imputed data set within the nonparametric bootstrap is valid | |
No standard procedure recommended in combining multiple imputation with the nonparametric bootstrap | |
Computation efficiency of multiple imputation embedded within resampling limits its application. |
Abbreviations: MAR, missing at random; MNAR, missing not at random.