Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 13;18(8):1479–1488. doi: 10.1007/s11548-022-02830-w

Table 1.

Evaluation of all models based on average surface distance (ASD), 95% Hausdorff distance (95HD), Caudolateral curve distance (CCD), Dice score (DSC) and bounding box overlap (BB IoU)

Model ASD (mm) 95HD (mm) CCD (mm) DSC (%) BB IoU (%)
Single step + dice loss 1.34 ± 0.27 2.58 ± 0.45 9.44 ± 4.95 92.95 ± 1.89 81.89 ± 5.81
Single step + Tversky loss 1.09 ± 0.23 2.28 ± 0.42 6.94 ± 4.93 91.75 ± 1.58 85.63 ± 4.63
Single step + focal Tversky loss 1.03 ± 0.20 2.19 ± 0.38 5.94 ± 4.13 91.54 ± 1.64 85.76 ± 4.46
Two-step + dice loss 0.36 ± 0.11 0.90 ± 0.31 1.24 ± 0.77 94.82 ± 1.91 93.38 ± 2.79
Two-step + Tversky loss 0.31 ± 0.09 0.96 ± 0.44 1.30 ± 1.02 93.87 ± 1.71 94.74 ± 2.12
Two-step + focal Tversky loss 0.35 ± 0.08 0.97 ± 0.31 1.71 ± 1.39 93.94 ± 1.79 94.85 ± 3.02