Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 12;2015(2):CD000184. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000184.pub4

Comparison 3. Vibroacoustic stimulation (B) vs placebo.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Cephalic presentation at birth (primary) 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Failure to achieve cephalic vaginal birth (composite outcome: caesarean section + vaginal breech birth) 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Caesarean section (primary) 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 Fetal bradycardia (primary) 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5 Failed external cephalic version 1 23 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.09 [0.01, 0.60]
6 Difficult external cephalic version 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
7 Maternal palpitations 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
8 Maternal headaches 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
9 Maternal hypotension 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
10 Operative vaginal birth 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
11 Maternal mortality 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
12 Maternal morbidity 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
13 Perinatal mortality 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
14 Perinatal morbidity 0 0 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]