Comparison 24. Talcum powder vs gel.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Cephalic presentation at birth (primary)	0		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
2 Failure to achieve cephalic vaginal birth (composite outcome: caesarean section + vaginal breech birth)	0	0	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Caesarean section (primary)	0		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
4 Fetal bradycardia (primary)	0		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
5 Failed external cephalic version (after first round of attempts)	1	95	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.26 [0.84, 1.89]
6 Difficult external cephalic version	0		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
7 Maternal palpitations	0		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
8 Maternal headaches	0		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
9 Maternal hypotension	0		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
10 Operative vaginal birth	0		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
11 Maternal mortality	0		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
12 Maternal morbidity	0		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
13 Perinatal mortality	0		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
14 Perinatal morbidity	0		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only