Table 1. Summary of what worked well, what worked less well and key recommendations for the advanced Field Epidemiology Training Programme of Papua New Guinea, based on root cause analysis, April 2022.
Risk communications and community engagement | ||
---|---|---|
Worked well | Worked less well | Recommendations |
Using established systems and community structures Partnerships with key stakeholders Community leaders trained and engaged in COVID-19 awareness Risk communications training for health-care workers (HCWs) at provincial and district levels Good political influence in the community Other partners helped develop information, education and communication (IEC) materials that were easy to understand by the community |
Misinformation about COVID-19 vaccination and the impact this has on COVID-19 vaccination and routine immunization HCWs spreading false rumours about the virus and COVID-19 vaccination Lack of established partnerships with communities affected communication and engagement efforts Provincial communication officers not always available Limited use of local languages in IEC materials |
Establish and maintain strong working relationships with community leaders and partners Establish high-quality training-of-trainers strategies to ensure HCWs at all levels are knowledgeable across response needs Establish recruitment strategy at provincial level to ensure adequate professional health staff to raise public health awareness alongside risk communication experts Continue to work with and build relationships with partners |
Surveillance, case investigation, laboratory | ||
Worked well | Worked less well | Recommendations |
Roll out of rapid antigen test kits Provincial-level management support for surveillance activities Opportunities afforded to Field Epidemiology Training Programme (FETP) fellows to apply surveillance skills Purchase of two-way radios for surveillance teams Training of health extension officers at district level to collect specimens Capitalizing on COVID-19 surveillance to strengthen other reporting systems Proactive response supported by appropriate legislation |
Turnaround time for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results (2–4 weeks) Turnaround time for whole genome sequencing Lack of training in data management No dedicated data management officers at provincial or district levels for COVID-19 |
Roll out COVID-19 rapid antigen tests at all facilities, including aid posts Ensure supply of rapid antigen tests is adequate Develop a sensitization programme to highlight the value of surveillance to management within the province |
Case management and infection prevention and control | ||
Worked well | Worked less well | Recommendations |
When available, rapid antigen tests helped with timely case detection/diagnosis Improved health facilities (e.g. construction of new wards and isolation facilities, instalment of incinerators, etc.) Creation and dissemination of treatment protocols Engagement of mental health counsellors |
Limited or no patient transport available No expertise to deal with mental health problems Standard treatment protocols not always available, confusion around the use of ivermectin Insufficient human resources for case management and infection prevention and control Poor coordination and cooperation between clinical and public health response Poor compliance with case isolation |
Direct funding and resources to boost health-care workforce Provide staff incentives for additional responsibilities Target educational resources to promote vaccination among HCWs Build new isolation facilities or separate COVID-19 wards with dedicated staff to work in them Ensure resources are allocated to home isolation monitoring Strengthen and invest in sustainability of call centres in all provinces (for example, integrate the call centre with the disaster office) Offer staff incentive packages and infection prevention and control training for those who work with COVID-19 patients |
Response, operational support and logistics | ||
Worked well | Worked less well | Recommendations |
Integration of COVID-19 response with other programmes Establishment of rapid response teams (RRTs) to support the response Strengthened emergency operations centres at the provincial level Coordination of funding available for COVID-19 response Involvement of partners/commercial properties to support response needs |
Staff shortage – inadequate staffing resulted in multitasking, exhaustion and mental stress Waste management issues (e.g. non-functional incinerators) Delay in receiving funds for the response Disruption to routine services, including routine childhood immunization Funding impacts on other programmes Poor compliance with control measures (mask wearing, physical distancing, isolation, quarantine, vaccination) |
Establish and allocate funding for a RRT in every province; use existing workforce to formulate RRTs Ensure there is a provincial budget for COVID-19 response and outbreaks with programme-based budgeting Establish processes at provincial level to facilitate rapid mobilization of financial and human resources in response to public health emergencies (with minimal impact on routine services) Provide targeted education and incentives to promote vaccination of HCWs at all levels |