Table 1.
Screening models for the low-middle-income countries.
| Binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy by ophthalmologists | Tele-imaging37,40,76 hub and spoke model | Neonatology lead model77 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Team | Ophthalmologists work in their respective SNCUs, and they are linked with the nodal centre | Imaging technicians and program co-ordinator work alongside remotely located Ophthalmologist | NICU nurses/paediatricians work alongside remotely located Ophthalmologist |
| Program coverage | Only to their respective SNCUs | One team can cover up to 5–6 districts in the current model | Respective SNCU/NICU |
| Technique | Direct examination of the retina using Binocular Indirect Ophthalmoscopy | Fundus images are taken by certified technicians | Fundus images are taken by certified nursing staff/doctors |
| Training | Done by qualified paediatric ophthalmologists | Level 1–3 technicians | Neonatal nursing or medical staff |
| Pros | Cost effective | Possible to screen large number of at-risk infants and possible to integrate with AI in the future | ‘Neonatal team owns the responsibility’ to screen all eligible infants and possible to integrate with AI in the future |
| Cons | There is a shortage of ophthalmologists trained to manage ROP and to meet the demand. Private NICU’s may not be able to access the service. No stored images for longitudinal viewing. |
Requirement for an administrative framework, including credentialing, to safeguard the imaging staff | Each neonatal unit requires a designated leader, imaging staff and imaging camera. Need high level of multidisciplinary coordination. |
SNCU; special newborn care unit, NICU, neonatal intensive care unit, AI: artificial intelligence.