Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 31;14:100153. doi: 10.1016/j.lansea.2023.100153

Table 2.

Multilevel logistic regression models assessing the relationship of delivery through caesarean section with health facility-, individual-, household-, and community-level factors (N = 4954).

Characteristics Null model Health facility-level model, AOR (95% CI) Health facility-, individual- and household-level model, AOR (95% CI) Health facility-, individual-, household-, and community-level model, AOR (95% CI)
General health service readiness
 Health facility management system 1.18 (0.98–1.36) 1.16 (0.96–1.40) 1.13 (0.91–1.42)
 Health facility infrastructure 1.88 (1.08–2.18)∗∗ 1.83 (1.05–2.08)∗∗ 1.83 (1.04–2.07)∗∗
Comprehensive obstetric care availability in health facility 3.17 (1.20–5.20)∗ 3.13 (1.34–5.13)∗ 3.14 (1.40–5.12)∗
Health facility readiness to provide comprehensive obstetric care 2.76 (2.14–3.18)∗∗ 2.24 (1.14–3.28)∗∗ 2.18 (1.15–3.28)∗∗
Average distance to the nearest health facility 0.84 (0.78–0.98)∗∗ 0.78 (0.44–0.98)∗∗ 0.72 (0.42–0.94)∗∗
Women's age
 ≤19 (ref) 1.00 1.00
 20–34 1.44 (1.20–1.71)∗∗ 1.44 (1.21–1.72)∗∗
 ≥35 1.81 (1.20–2.73)∗∗ 1.75 (1.16–2.64)∗∗
Women's educational attainment
 No education (Ref) 1.00 1.00
 Primary 0.95 (0.65–1.38) 0.94 (0.65–1.38)
 Secondary 1.42 (0.98–2.08) 1.40 (0.96–2.05)
 Higher 2.12 (1.39–3.23)∗∗ 2.11 (1.38–3.22)∗∗
Women's employment status
 Not employed (ref) 1.00 1.00
 Employed 0.74 (0.63–0.86)∗∗ 0.69 (0.58–0.80)∗∗
Husbands' educational attainment
 No formal education (ref) 1.00 1.00
 Primary 1.07 (0.82–1.39) 1.08 (0.83–1.41)
 Secondary 1.32 (1.01–1.74)∗ 1.35 (1.03–1.77)∗
 Higher 2.04 (1.47–2.83)∗∗ 1.98 (1.42–2.75)∗∗
Husbands' occupation status
 Agricultural worker (ref) 1.00 1.00
 Physical worker 1.09 (0.88–1.35) 1.13 (0.91–1.39)
 Services 1.52 (1.05–2.21)∗ 1.59 (1.10–2.30)
 Business 1.12 (0.88–1.43) 1.17 (0.92–1.49)
 Other 0.53 (0.09–3.28) 0.57 (0.09–3.49)
Total children ever born
 1–2 (ref) 1.00 1.00
 >2 0.64 (0.53–0.79)∗∗ 0.67 (0.56–0.82)∗∗
Intervals between the two most recent live births
 ≤2 years 1.00 1.00
 3–4 years 1.11 (0.78–1.56) 1.10 (0.78–1.55)
 >4 years 1.67 (1.23–2.27)∗∗ 1.57 (1.15–2.14)∗∗
Family types
 Nuclear (ref) 1.00 1.00
 Joint 0.90 (0.77–1.05) 0.94 (0.80–1.10)
Household wealth status
 Richest (ref) 2.37 (1.88–2.99)∗∗ 1.00
 Richer 1.12 (0.90–1.39) 2.43 (1.90–3.11)∗∗
 Middle 1.00 1.13 (0.91–1.41)
 Poorer 0.76 (0.60–0.95)∗∗ 0.75 (0.60–0.95)∗∗
 Poorest 0.48 (0.37–0.63)∗∗ 0.49 (0.38–0.64)∗∗
Type of residential place
 Urban (ref) 1.00
 Rural 1.00 (0.83–1.21)
Region of residence
 Barishal (ref) 1.00
 Chattogram 0.75 (0.54–1.05)
 Dhaka 1.40 (1.01–1.95)∗
 Khulna 1.93 (1.37–2.72)∗∗
 Mymensingh 1.19 (0.84–1.69)
 Rajshahi 1.64 (1.16–2.32)∗∗
 Rangpur 1.35 (0.95–1.91)
 Sylhet 0.86 (0.60–1.22)
Random effects (Measures of variation for short birth interval)
 Community level variance (SE) 0.91 (0.11)∗∗ 0.59 (0.06)∗∗ 0.51 (0.07)∗∗ 0.42 (0.06)∗∗
 ICC 0.216 0.095 0.073 0.050
 PCV Reference 35.16% 43.95% 53.85%
 Median odds ratio 2.48 1.75 1.63 1.44
 Model fit statistics
 AIC 6126.08 5244.86 5208.38 4436.93
 BIC 6139.11 5394.19 5409.66 4564.98

Note: Model 1 is the null model, a baseline model without any determinant variables. Model 2 is adjusted for health facility-level factors. Model 3 is adjusted for health facility-, individual- and household-level factors. Model 4 is adjusted for health facility-, individual-, household- and community-level factors. AIC: Akaike's Information Criteria, BIC: Bayesian Information Criteria, PCV: Percentage Change in Variance. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗p < 0.05.