Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Card Fail. 2023 Jan 24;29(7):1017–1028. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.12.016

Table 2.

CNN performance in detecting PH in each of the test datasets

AUC Sensitivity Specificity PPV, % NPV, % PH+ in test
set, n
Controls
in test set,
n
Disease prevalence
in dataset
PH at a prevalence of 20% 0.89 (0.88-0.90) 0.79 (0.76-0.81) 0.84 (0.83-0.85) 0.56 (0.53-0.58) 0.94 (0.93-0.95) 982 3903 20
PH at a prevalence of 1% 0.88 (0.83-0.93) 0.79 (0.68-0.90) 0.84 (0.83-0.85) 0.05 (0.03-0.06) 1.00 (1.00-1.00) 39 3903 1
Pre-capillary PH 0.91 (0.89-0.94) 0.83 (0.78-0.88) 0.84 (0.83-0.88) 0.17 (0.14-0.19) 0.99 (0.99-0.99) 147 87 63
Group 1 PH – PAH 0.94 (0.92-0.96) 0.88 (0.83-0.93) 0.84 (0.83-0.85) 0.15 (0.12-0.17) 1.0 (0.99-1.0) 119 87 56
Group 3 PH – PH due to lung disease and/or hypoxia 0.9 (0.89-0.91) 0.81 (0.77-0.84) 0.84 (0.83-0.85) 0.31 (0.29-0.34) 0.98 (0.98-0.98) 169 80 68

AUC=area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; PPV=positive predictive value; NPV=negative predictive value; PH=pulmonary hypertension; value (95% confidence interval)