Table 1.
Changes in RMR reported by selected exercise interventions.
reference | sample | intervention | frequency | length (d) | diet | weight change (kg) | FFM change (kg) | FM change (kg) | RMR change (kcal d−1) | predicted RMR changea (kcal d−1) | estimated metabolic adaptation (kcal d−1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tremblay et al. [26] | 14 male monozygotic twins | cycling | 2× per day | 93 | maintain baseline | −5.0 | −0.1 | −4.9 | −138 | −50 | −88 |
Byrne et al. [27] | 9 sedentary women | walking and resistance training | 3–4× per week | 140 | n.a. | 1.7 | 1.9 | −0.2 | −53 | 22 | −75 |
Westerterp et al. [28] | 23 men and women | running | 4× per week | 280 | ad libitum | −1.0 | 2.7 | −3.6 | −62 | −2 | −59 |
Koehler et al. [29] | 7 sedentary women | aerobic exercise to increase TDEE by 30% | 5× per week | 90 | maintain baseline | −2.7 | −0.1 | −2.2 | −77 | −22 | −54 |
Hand et al. [30] | 26 overweight men and women | walking and running to expend 17.5 kcal kg−1 week−1 | n.a. | 182 | maintain weight | −0.4 | 0.2 | −0.4 | 2 | −2 | 3 |
Hand et al. [30] | 23 overweight men and women | walking and running to expend 35 kcal kg−1 week−1 | n.a. | 182 | maintain weight | −0.6 | 0.7 | −1.0 | 3 | −2 | 5 |
Frey-Hewitt et al. [31] | 21 overweight men | walking and running | 3× per week | 365 | maintain baseline | −4.1 | 0 | −4.1 | −23 | −41 | 18 |
Martin et al. [32] | 61 overweight men and women | walking and running to expend 20 kcal kg−1 week−1 | 3–5× per week | 168 | ad libitum | −1.6 | −0.1 | −1.4 | 6 | −15 | 21 |
Martin et al. [32] | 59 overweight men and women | walking and running to expend 8 kcal kg−1 week−1 | 3–5× per week | 168 | ad libitum | −0.4 | −0.3 | −0.2 | 48 | −6 | 54 |
Koehler et al. [29] | 9 sedentary women | aerobic exercise to increase TDEE by 30% | 5× per week | 90 | matched increase in TDEE | −1.1 | 0.5 | −1.1 | 119 | −5 | 124 |
Goran & Poehlmann [33] | 11 older men and women | cycling | 3× per week | 56 | n.a. | 0 | 0.8 | −0.9 | 167 | 1.7 | 165 |
aRMR change was predicted using coefficients of 12.4 kcal kg−1 for changes in FFM and 9.9 kcal kg−1 for changes in FM, respectively (https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/80.5.1379).