Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 10;14:1220887. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1220887

Table 4.

The use of ruxolitinib and upadacitinib in treating autoimmune bullous disease.

Age/
gender
Types of AIBD Complica-tion Previous therapies Treatment Efficacy of initial JAK inhibitors Tapering of JAK inhibitors Efficacy of maintenance treatment AE Relapse
Fan et al., 2022 (60) 31/F PNP Castleman’s disease Prednisolone, cyclosporine, azithromycin Ruxolitinib 5mg/d,
prednisolone 10mg/d,
cyclosporine 100mg/d
The symptoms were improved. NA Clinical presentation and laboratory tests improved. NA None
Gresham et al., 2023 (61) 74/F DIBP SCCHN, malignant melanoma Prednisone, TCS Upadacitinib, 15 mg/d The patient demonstrate response to upadacitinib NA NA NA NA
Nash et al., 2023 (62) 81/F BP HT, dyslipidemia, osteoarthritis, endometriosis Prednisone Upadacitinib, 15 mg/d,
prednisone
Complete resolution of disease. NA Continued efficacy with further healing of the skin and complete resolution of the disease. None None

AIBD, autoimmune bullous disease; AE, adverse effect; PNP, paraneoplastic pemphigus; DIBP, drug-induced bullous pemphigoid; BP, bullous pemphigoid; SCCHN, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck; HT, hypertension; TCS, topical corticosteroids; M, male; F, female; NA, not available; mg/d, mg/day.