Table 3.
Sensitivity analysis of PSQI scores.
| Deletion | Heterogeneity | SMD; 95%CI; p-value |
|---|---|---|
| Celik 2022 | p < 0.001; I2 = 76% | SMD-0.62; 95%CI (−1.14, −0.10); p = 0.02 |
| Fox 2020 | p < 0.001; I2 = 76% | SMD-0.56; 95%CI (−1.03, −0.08); p = 0.02 |
| Garland 2020 | p < 0.001; I2 = 82% | SMD-0.82; 95%CI (−1.45, −0.18); p = 0.01 |
| Ozkaraman 2018 | p < 0.001; I2 = 82% | SMD-0.76; 95%CI (−1.34, −0.19); p < 0.01 |
| Rissling 2022 | p < 0.001; I2 = 81% | SMD-0.85; 95%CI (−1.41, −0.28); p < 0.01 |
| Starreveld 2021 | p = 0.003; I2 = 68% | SMD-0.86; 95%CI (−1.36, −0.37); p < 0.01 |
| Weiss 2018 | p < 0.001; I2 = 81% | SMD-0.67; 95%CI (−1.20, −0.13); p = 0.01 |
| Wu 2018 | p < 0.001; I2 = 81% | SMD-0.70; 95%CI (−1.27, −0.14); p = 0.01 |
| Yennurajalingam 2020 | p < 0.001; I2 = 82% | SMD-0.70; 95%CI (−1.25, −0.15); p = 0.01 |