TABLE 6.
Mean scores obtained by the rubric assessing specific and transversal competences according to the evaluators. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Data in the same column is compared using ANOVA with subsequent Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc analysis *denotes statistically significant differences between evaluator 9 with the others evaluators for the competency “To know how to be there”. # denotes statistically significant differences between evaluators 7 and 10 for the competency “To know how to be there”. § denotes statistically significant differences between evaluators 7 and 8 for the competency “To know how to be”. In all cases p < 0.05.
| Evaluator | Number of students | “To know how to do” | “To know how to be there” (communication with the patient) | “To know how to be” (dealing with the patient |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluator 1 | 33 | 6.62 ± 2.67 | 7.36 ± 2.1 | 7.44 ± 2.09 |
| Evaluator 2 | 46 | 8.07 ± 1.64 | 7.82 ± 1.78 | 7.96 ± 1.57 |
| Evaluator 3 | 182 | 7.49 ± 1.73 | 7.41 ± 1.71 | 7.33 ± 1.90 |
| Evaluator 4 | 74 | 7.77 ± 2.17 | 7.93 ± 1.72 | 7.51 ± 2.06 |
| Evaluator 5 | 22 | 7.90 ± 0.99 | 8.59 ± 1.20 | 8.22 ± 1.15 |
| Evaluator 6 | 69 | 8.13 ± 1.97 | 8.66 ± 1.44 | 8.24 ± 1.66 |
| Evaluator 7 | 10 | 7.10 ± 2.33 | 7.3 ± 1.56# | 7.10 ± 1.79§ |
| Evaluator 8 | 8 | 7.87 ± 1.72 | 8.37 ± 1.5 | 9.25 ± 0.71§ |
| Evaluator 9 | 21 | 6.43 ± 1.74 | 6.05 ± 1.11* | 8.76 ± 0.88 |
| Evaluator 10 | 15 | 6.80 ± 1.94 | 8.86 ± 0.91# | 8.86 ± 1.06 |
| Evaluator 11 | 46 | 7.93 ± 1.48 | 8.45 ± 1.35 | 8.51 ± 1.65 |